2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2017.8015721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive fuzzy exponent cluster ensemble system based feature selection and spectral clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our clustering experiments, we used 6 datasets from the UCI Machine Learning Repository [63] under noise free environment. These data illustrated in Table XIII are also used to compare our approach with other unsupervised clustering algorithms like Fuzzy k-means (FKM), Cluster Forest (CF) [69], Type-1 and Type-2 Fuzzy Cmeans (FCM and FCM2 respectively) [62], Bagged Clustering (BC2) [64], Evidence Accumulation (EA) [65] and Random Projection (RP) [66]. As cited in [69], there exist some metrics that can be used for clustering quality comparison.…”
Section: Clustering Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our clustering experiments, we used 6 datasets from the UCI Machine Learning Repository [63] under noise free environment. These data illustrated in Table XIII are also used to compare our approach with other unsupervised clustering algorithms like Fuzzy k-means (FKM), Cluster Forest (CF) [69], Type-1 and Type-2 Fuzzy Cmeans (FCM and FCM2 respectively) [62], Bagged Clustering (BC2) [64], Evidence Accumulation (EA) [65] and Random Projection (RP) [66]. As cited in [69], there exist some metrics that can be used for clustering quality comparison.…”
Section: Clustering Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XII represents the comparison between the same clustering methods above-cited for the metric C. All results for BC2, EA and RP were taken from[70]. Results for Cluster Forest and those for Type-2 Fuzzy C-means were derived from[69] and[62], respectively. As described in Table XI and XII, the findings, obtained for S1 and S2 measures, show relevant and significant results reaching 83% and 86% for the metric R and C, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the long geological data acquisition [7], the population of reflection and wireless sensor network (WSN) are suitable [8]. In this article, some sensor networks can be used for the actual design and implementation of the complete wireless sensor network architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%