2014
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.3143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive fault‐tolerant control for feedback linearizable systems with an aircraft application

Abstract: SummaryThis paper investigates fault‐tolerant control (FTC) for feedback linearizable systems (FLSs) and its applications. The dynamic effects caused by the actuator faults on the feedback linearized model are firstly analyzed, which reveals that under actuator faults, the control input in the linearized model is affected by uncertain terms. In the framework of model reference control, the first FTC strategy is proposed as a robust controller, which achieves asymptotic tracking control of the FLS under actuato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• FTC design for nonlinear systems: several strategies have been proposed to deal with nonlinear systems, such as feedback linearization [107], nonlinear dynamic inversion [78], backstepping [360] and neural networks [365] among others. However, as stated by [372], the development of effective design methods for dealing with nonlinear FTCS issues is still an open research problem.…”
Section: Recent Developments Of Fault Tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• FTC design for nonlinear systems: several strategies have been proposed to deal with nonlinear systems, such as feedback linearization [107], nonlinear dynamic inversion [78], backstepping [360] and neural networks [365] among others. However, as stated by [372], the development of effective design methods for dealing with nonlinear FTCS issues is still an open research problem.…”
Section: Recent Developments Of Fault Tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, adaptive controllers have been studied and particularly those in an l 1 framework have also seen a renaissance. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Sliding mode approaches have also been studied [39][40][41] and tested, particularly in Europe. 13 These papers argue that actuator faults can be viewed as a class of matched uncertainty and that the inherent robustness properties of the sliding mode control schemes can be exploited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() Passive FTC is essentially a robust controller with a limited fault‐tolerant capacity, whereas active FTC is proposed to integrate fault identification and control reconfiguration together, aiming to synthesize a new controller online to accommodate severe faults. Among the most recent results, a robust FTC strategy with feedback linearization and adaptive technique is developed for an air‐breathing hypersonic vehicle under actuator faults in the work of Gao et al A switching FTC approach is applied to an air‐breathing hypersonic vehicle subject to time‐varying actuator and sensor faults in the work of Wu and Cai . An adaptive output feedback fault‐tolerant controller is presented for a hypersonic vehicle with actuator faults in the work of He et al An FTC scheme based on the adaptive backstepping technique is developed against actuator fault of a hypersonic vehicle in the work of Xu et al An active FTC strategy is proposed for an HSV described by the Takagi‐Sugeno fuzzy model with actuator faults in the work of Shen et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%