2006
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2005.864027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive control of surviving symbol replica candidates in QRM-MLD for OFDM MIMO multiplexing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, for simplicity, we use , where the value of radius is predetermined as described in Section II. Two separate and independent candidate searches for two groups of antennas are represented by (10) and (12). The computational complexity of the presented detection approach is reduced compared to the QRD-M algorithm thanks to a lower complexity of these two partial candidate searches.…”
Section: Qrd-qld-based Parallel Candidate-search Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, for simplicity, we use , where the value of radius is predetermined as described in Section II. Two separate and independent candidate searches for two groups of antennas are represented by (10) and (12). The computational complexity of the presented detection approach is reduced compared to the QRD-M algorithm thanks to a lower complexity of these two partial candidate searches.…”
Section: Qrd-qld-based Parallel Candidate-search Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the original QRD-M detector still requires high computational complexity in calculating accumulated branch metrics, two categorized approaches have been proposed to reduce this problem. In [5], [8]- [11], the required computations can be reduced by controlling a number of survivor paths, whereas a number of branch metrics being used in one survivor path at each detection stage is selected effectively using reliable symbol information [12], [13]. However, in these works, error-rate performance of the original QRD-M detector has been sacrificed for reduction in computational complexity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the detection throughput is nonfixed, which is not desirable for real-time hardware implementation. To resolve this problem, an MLD with QR decomposition and an M-algorithm (QRM-MLD) [12,13] was proposed. At each search layer in QRM-MLD, only the best M candidates are kept for the next level search and therefore, it has a fixed complexity and throughput that is suitable for the pipeline hardware implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each search layer in QRM-MLD, only the best M candidates are kept for the next level search and therefore, it has a fixed complexity and throughput that is suitable for the pipeline hardware implementation. However, since these algorithms, which are based on the tree search, rely on the computation of many path metrics by using QR decomposition, the complexity is still exponentially increasing with the number of transmit antennas [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include an adaptive QRD-M [7], a partial decision feedback (PDF) QRD-M [8] and a very low complexity (VLC) QRD-M [9]. However, there are more or less limitations in these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%