2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2005.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive control of automotive electronic throttle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
71
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations for calculating the parameters in the limphome compensator are given in Equation (18). For this specific throttle the slope below the limp home position is only slightly higher than the slope above, but this difference can be larger, see for example Scattolini et al (1997), Pavkvić et al (2006).…”
Section: The Static Compensators -Ramp Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equations for calculating the parameters in the limphome compensator are given in Equation (18). For this specific throttle the slope below the limp home position is only slightly higher than the slope above, but this difference can be larger, see for example Scattolini et al (1997), Pavkvić et al (2006).…”
Section: The Static Compensators -Ramp Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would amend problems that could arise due to parameter variations during a single engine run, for example due to variations in battery voltage and external temperature. These variations has been thoroughly discussed in Pavkvić et al (2006) where an adaptive control is proposed, and is not treated here. Figure 17 compare the controller performance with correct friction estimation and where the friction has been underestimated of 30%.…”
Section: Error In Limp-home Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its challenging control features, the ETB has often been chosen as an ideal case study to investigate the performance and robustness of adaptive control schemes in the face of model uncertainties and disturbances as discussed, for example, in [11], [1], [3], [28], [7], [18]. Furthermore, when MRAC algorithms are used to tame the ETB dynamics, the presence of unmodeled terms can induce an unbounded drift of the adaptive gains [2], which are undesirable for safety reasons.…”
Section: Dtmcsi-pp Control Of An Automotive Actuatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auto-tuner provides desired control performance, regardless of variations in electronic throttle body parameters due to production deviations, external conditions variations, and effects on aging also. Self-tuning strategy deals with process parameter variations which occur during a single engine run [19,20]. Also the control systems developments by some of researches have focused to deal with the electronic throttle nonlinearities, based on neural network [21,22] and fuzzy logic [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%