2020
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10050285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Boosting Based Personalized Glucose Monitoring System (PGMS) for Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Prediction with Improved Accuracy

Abstract: In this paper, we present an architecture of a personalized glucose monitoring system (PGMS). PGMS consists of both invasive and non-invasive sensors on a single device. Initially, blood glucose is measured invasively and non-invasively, to train the machine learning models. Then, paired data and corresponding errors are divided scientifically into six different clusters based on blood glucose ranges as per the patient’s diabetic conditions. Each cluster is trained to build the unique error prediction model us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MARD was an indication of error rate scale between predicted glucose level and reference glucose level. Generally, a BG meter has an accuracy of 15% MARD 40 (supplementary material Method 3 , Sect. 7).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MARD was an indication of error rate scale between predicted glucose level and reference glucose level. Generally, a BG meter has an accuracy of 15% MARD 40 (supplementary material Method 3 , Sect. 7).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A personalized glucose monitoring system (PGMS) comprises both non-invasive and invasive sensors on a solitary device [ 156 ]. In one study, blood glucose data was used for training the ML models.…”
Section: The Application Of ML and Dl Models For The Management Predi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MARD shows how close is the measured value from the actual value. The smaller the percentage, the more accurate the device is [13,67].…”
Section: Regulations and Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is that PEG analysis differentiates between type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Table 3 describes the risk assessment for each zone in CEG analysis and PEG analysis [5,13,67]. The performance of the non-invasive continuous blood glucose monitoring devices is usually validated against the invasive methods that are considered the gold standard.…”
Section: Regulations and Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%