2006
DOI: 10.1300/j158v06n03_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Behavior, Mental Retardation, and the Death Penalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atkins evaluators rely upon a wide assortment of data from collateral sources including, but not limited to, school records, employment records, disability evaluations, and adaptive behavior assessment data. Evaluators also rely on data from multiple respondents in order to demonstrate consistency and convergence between reports (Stevens & Price, 2006), as well as to corroborate information as suggested by the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology (2012; herein referred to as the Guidelines). One issue in collecting information from third-party sources is eliciting the appropriate amount and level of disclosure without creating undue bias on part of the respondent.…”
Section: Information Gathering In Atkins Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Atkins evaluators rely upon a wide assortment of data from collateral sources including, but not limited to, school records, employment records, disability evaluations, and adaptive behavior assessment data. Evaluators also rely on data from multiple respondents in order to demonstrate consistency and convergence between reports (Stevens & Price, 2006), as well as to corroborate information as suggested by the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology (2012; herein referred to as the Guidelines). One issue in collecting information from third-party sources is eliciting the appropriate amount and level of disclosure without creating undue bias on part of the respondent.…”
Section: Information Gathering In Atkins Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistency among thirdparty reports provides evidence of valid responses and reliable respondents (Stevens & Price, 2006). Tassé (2009) takes this issue of consistency one step further by suggesting the collection of information from respondents across multiple contexts (e.g., school, home, work, etc.)…”
Section: Detection Of Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use of standardized adaptive behavior scale that was normed on the general population . obtaining corroborating information to support the information obtained on the standardized assessment Stevens and Price (2006) recommended that future research in the area of adaptive behavior assessment should develop norms on prison populations. This author strongly disagrees with this notion.…”
Section: Assessment Of Adaptive Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader is encouraged to consult previously published articles that have already provided excellent reviews (Luckasson et al, 2002;Reschly, Myers, & Hartel, 2002;Stevens & Price, 2006). Rather, we will focus on discussing measurement issues that are most relevant when assessing adaptive behavior for the purpose of making or ruling out a diagnosis of mental retardation.…”
Section: Mental Retardationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, a person's adaptive behavior is what a person has done rather than what he or she may have done or could have done if raised in more ideal conditions (Schalock, 1999;Stevens & Price, 2006;Bonnie & Gustafson, 2007;Schalock et al, 2007). The 2002 AAMR defi nition stated: "Adaptive behavior is the collection of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned by people in order to function in their everyday lives" (p. 73).…”
Section: The Nature Of Adaptive Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%