2004
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2003.819857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Beamforming With Joint Robustness Against Mismatched Signal Steering Vector and Interference Nonstationarity

Abstract: Adaptive beamforming methods degrade in the presence of both signal steering vector errors and interference nonstationarity. We develop a new approach to adaptive beamforming that is jointly robust against these two phenomena. Our beamformer is based on the optimization of the worst case performance. A computationally efficient convex optimization-based algorithm is proposed to compute the beamformer weights. Computer simulations demonstrate that our beamformer has an improved robustness as compared to other p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see that the modified channel probability constraint (14) is tighter than the one proposed in [11], but both fulfill the probability constraint (9). Figure 2 shows a typical CDF for the data power w H Rw, whose value should be less than η with probability p = 0.9 according to (10). We can see that the probability constraint (10) is as fulfilled.…”
Section: A Performance On Single-state Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can see that the modified channel probability constraint (14) is tighter than the one proposed in [11], but both fulfill the probability constraint (9). Figure 2 shows a typical CDF for the data power w H Rw, whose value should be less than η with probability p = 0.9 according to (10). We can see that the probability constraint (10) is as fulfilled.…”
Section: A Performance On Single-state Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Designs for deterministic uncertainty regions have been studies extensively [5]- [7], [9], [10], including algorithms that consider both channel distortion and interference covariance uncertainty [5]. However, under stochastic uncertainty model, existing algorithms are only robust against channel distortions [11] while neglecting the role of interference covariance matrix estimation errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case the information of optimal signal vector is concomitant with error in conventional techniques, the performance is significantly decreased [4] and [9][10][11]. This performance directs the design toward optimization in the worst situation [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The distribution pattern formers vector is obtained while assuming that the limitations output possibility is lower than what has been determined.Convex optimization is used for solving the problems in these methods.…”
Section: Figure 1-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later contributions to the topic include [5]- [7], [9], [11]- [13]. Next we will review the March 7, 2013 DRAFT most recent works which are related to our applications.…”
Section: A Related Recent Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further fundamental contributions on robust beamforming can be found in, e.g., [5]- [13] (see also the references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%