2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-012-9167-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting the Facilitating Conditions Questionnaire (FCQ) for Bilingual Filipino Adolescents: Validating English and Filipino Versions

Abstract: This study examined the applicability of the English and Filipino versions of the Facilitating Conditions Questionnaire (FCQ) among Filipino high school students. The FCQ measures the external forces in students’ social environments that can influence their motivation for school. It is composed of 11 factors: university intention, school valuing, parent support, teacher support, peer help, leave school, pride from others, negative parent influence, affect to school, negative peer influence, and positive peer i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There remains a lack of empirical research into the psychometric properties of this instrument in the Asian context (i.e., Hong Kong). In agreement with findings from previous validation studies (e.g., Ganotice, Bernardo, and King 2013;King, Ganotice, and Watkins 2012), the inherent methodological danger in using instruments in cross-cultural settings is the understanding that instruments previously validated have universal applicability which can substantially jeopardise the soundness of cross-cultural comparisons (van de Vijver and Hambleton 1996;van de Vijver, and Tanzer 1997) suggesting the need to take into account the linguistic and cultural differences in test adaptation.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…There remains a lack of empirical research into the psychometric properties of this instrument in the Asian context (i.e., Hong Kong). In agreement with findings from previous validation studies (e.g., Ganotice, Bernardo, and King 2013;King, Ganotice, and Watkins 2012), the inherent methodological danger in using instruments in cross-cultural settings is the understanding that instruments previously validated have universal applicability which can substantially jeopardise the soundness of cross-cultural comparisons (van de Vijver and Hambleton 1996;van de Vijver, and Tanzer 1997) suggesting the need to take into account the linguistic and cultural differences in test adaptation.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Such inconsistencies in the SPQ factor structure highlight a need for confirmatory research, particularly in populations not previously a target of research, given the significant cultural differences in presentations of schizophrenia (Bhui and Tsangarides, ). The aims of such confirmatory research are aligned with a growing push to validate translations of personality and psychological scales in populations distinct from those where the original scales were developed (see e.g., Davis et al ., ; Ganotice et al ., ; Littman‐Ovadia et al ., ; Fong et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FCQ has been found to be valid in a previous study among Filipino students (Ganotice et al, 2012a). For example, Ganotice et al (2012a) obtained a mean Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.86 for the different subscales in the FCQ, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.77 to 0.9.…”
Section: Affect To Schoolmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, Ganotice et al (2012a) obtained a mean Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.86 for the different subscales in the FCQ, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.77 to 0.9. In particular, they found that the affect to school subscale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.77.…”
Section: Affect To Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%