2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-019-1507-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting the engine to the fuel: mutator populations can reduce the mutational load by reorganizing their genome structure

Abstract: Background Mutators are common in bacterial populations, both in natural isolates and in the lab. The fate of these lineages, which mutation rate is increased up to 100 ×, has long been studied using population genetics models, showing that they can spread in a population following an environmental change. However in stable conditions, they suffer from the increased mutational load, hence being overcome by non-mutators. However, these results don’t take into account the fact that an elevated mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical models indicate that the organization of genetic information along the chromosome is influenced by the mutational operators that act on it [22, 3639]. As a consequence of this organization, mutations may be more likely to generate mutant offspring with specific characteristics, such as reduced competition with the wildtype due to low fitness [4043], lower propensity for social conflicts [44] or accelerated re-adaptation to variable environments [45]. In prokaryotes, mutational operators that can drive functional mutagenesis include horizontal gene transfer, which drives the rapid evolution of gene content [31, 4648], and the CRISPR-Cas system, that generates immunity to viral infections through targeted incorporation of viral genomes [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models indicate that the organization of genetic information along the chromosome is influenced by the mutational operators that act on it [22, 3639]. As a consequence of this organization, mutations may be more likely to generate mutant offspring with specific characteristics, such as reduced competition with the wildtype due to low fitness [4043], lower propensity for social conflicts [44] or accelerated re-adaptation to variable environments [45]. In prokaryotes, mutational operators that can drive functional mutagenesis include horizontal gene transfer, which drives the rapid evolution of gene content [31, 4648], and the CRISPR-Cas system, that generates immunity to viral infections through targeted incorporation of viral genomes [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an evolvable genetic structure enables evolution to fine tune the distribution of offspring fitness, selecting for robustness and/or evolvability when needed. This fine tuning can even allow for simultaneous selection of robustness and evolvability, as exemplified by the results of Jaap Rutten [29]. His experiments show that organisms in which the point mutation rate is raised by a factor of 100 react by reorganizing their genome.…”
Section: Evolution Of Genetic Architecture and The Role Of Non-codingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the core of these issues lies a common element: the capability of organisms to adaptevolvability [1]. Evolvability research sheds new light on genomic architecture [2], the structure of regulatory networks [3,4], and many other features of biological systems (see Glossary). It has yielded surprising new insights, such as: adaptive evolution can proceed at a pace similar to ecological change, resulting in intricate and unexpected ecoevolutionary dynamics [5,6]; evolvability and robustness do not conflict but mutually reinforce each other [3,7,8]; and organisms with high evolvability can 'generalize' over environments [9,10].…”
Section: Evolvability Is An Important Yet Elusive Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, determinants may affect evolvability by providing variation. The mutation rate is the most obvious example of such a determinant [2,[15][16][17]. Second, determinants may affect evolvability by influencing the effect of variation on fitness.…”
Section: Categorizing the Determinants Of Evolvabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%