2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2010.2043343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapted Output Space-Mapping Technique for a Bi-Objective Optimization

Abstract: Multi-objective optimizations by means of 3D finite element models result in very high computation burden. To have an affordable computation cost, the output space-mapping technique is applied with a new method where the scalar correction of the model outputs is replaced by a set of corrective functions. This method is used for the bi-objective optimization of a transformer and allows finding the complete Pareto optimal set in less than two days on a laptop.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MDF þ FP within OSM Results obtained from this process are satisfactory but it is time consuming because the three FE sub-models of the transformer are evaluated several times within OSM algorithm until the convergence of the FP method (Tran et al, 2010).…”
Section: Mdo Formulations Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDF þ FP within OSM Results obtained from this process are satisfactory but it is time consuming because the three FE sub-models of the transformer are evaluated several times within OSM algorithm until the convergence of the FP method (Tran et al, 2010).…”
Section: Mdo Formulations Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K RIGING, as a type of regression model, is able to predict response surface of the objective function through exploiting the spatial correlation of data which based only on limited information [1]- [3]. However, it was found that large-scale tasks-multi-objective and employing many design variables-may lead to a "combinatorial explosion" when all the required correlation matrices are established between the sample points and the design vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows benefiting both from the rapidity of the analytical model (coarse model) and the accuracy of the FEM (fine model) by aligning them (Bandler et al, 1994;Jonathan et al, 2014). The SM technique has been applied successfully for the optimal design of electromagnetic devices, such as linear actuator (Stéphane et al, 2011), transformer (Berbecea et al, 2012Tran et al, 2010) and permanent magnet machine (Legranger et al, 2010). Classically, two models with different granularities are used in the SM technique, the fine model is often FEM, and the coarse model can be an analytical one or a surrogate model, or it can also be a FEM but with coarse mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different strategies have been compared by Vivier and Friedrich (2016). Several variants of SM have recently been developed, and among these, the most common are the output space mapping (OSM) (Tran et al, 2010) and manifold mapping (MM) (Echeverria et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%