2021
DOI: 10.15453/2168-6408.1845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptations to Early Intervention Service Delivery During COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the shift to telehealth, particularly for diagnostic evaluations (Berger et al, 2021 ; Dahiya et al, 2021 ). As COVID-19 has necessitated the near ubiquitous use of telehealth to conduct diagnostic and/or eligibility assessments and to deliver early intervention services, this ‘natural experiment’ has highlighted the many ways in which telehealth may be leveraged to deliver services (Edelman, 2020 ; Little & Stoffel, 2021 ). Despite these benefits, there remain some aspects of face-to-face delivery that offer several advantages over telehealth, including administration of standardized developmental and/or cognitive measures, firsthand interaction and observation of more subtle behaviors, and experiential preference by families and/or clinicians (Corona et al, 2020 ; Juárez et al, 2018b ; Wagner et al, 2021 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the shift to telehealth, particularly for diagnostic evaluations (Berger et al, 2021 ; Dahiya et al, 2021 ). As COVID-19 has necessitated the near ubiquitous use of telehealth to conduct diagnostic and/or eligibility assessments and to deliver early intervention services, this ‘natural experiment’ has highlighted the many ways in which telehealth may be leveraged to deliver services (Edelman, 2020 ; Little & Stoffel, 2021 ). Despite these benefits, there remain some aspects of face-to-face delivery that offer several advantages over telehealth, including administration of standardized developmental and/or cognitive measures, firsthand interaction and observation of more subtle behaviors, and experiential preference by families and/or clinicians (Corona et al, 2020 ; Juárez et al, 2018b ; Wagner et al, 2021 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%