1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00044888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation to salinity inHordeum jubatum L. populations studied using reciprocal transplants

Abstract: Tillers and seedlings of Hordeum jubatum L. from three sites with contrasting salinity regimes in central Saskatchewan, Canada were reciprocally transplanted in order to examine the tolerance of populations of this species to salinity and related habitat factors. Survival, growth and fecundity of the three populations were controlled more by transplant site characteristics than by genetic differences, i.e. differences among populations at a site tended to be smaller than differences among sites. Survival, grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are limited data regarding the plastic reproductive strategies of clonal plants exposed to salinity stress. The clonal perennials Sporobolus virginicus and Hordeum jubatum tend to decrease sexual reproduction in higher salinity sites (Blits & Gallagher 1991;Wang & Redmann 1996), in support of the Sakai (1995) and Gardner & Mangel (1999) models. The exception demonstrated by irises in this study suggests that alternative strategies may emerge from plants with different life histories and environmental conditions (Loehle 1987;Stanton et al 2000).…”
Section:    supporting
confidence: 59%
“…There are limited data regarding the plastic reproductive strategies of clonal plants exposed to salinity stress. The clonal perennials Sporobolus virginicus and Hordeum jubatum tend to decrease sexual reproduction in higher salinity sites (Blits & Gallagher 1991;Wang & Redmann 1996), in support of the Sakai (1995) and Gardner & Mangel (1999) models. The exception demonstrated by irises in this study suggests that alternative strategies may emerge from plants with different life histories and environmental conditions (Loehle 1987;Stanton et al 2000).…”
Section:    supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Investigators have noted that the effects of airborne salt depend on species and population, ranging from increases in mortality and leaf damage and/or decreases in growth, to relatively little or no effect in species (or populations) that exhibit some level of salt ''tolerance'' (Oosting and Billings, 1942;Oosting, 1945;Cartica and Quinn, 1980;Barbour, De Jong, and Pavlik, 1985;Sykes and Wilson, 1988;Greipsson, Ahokas, and Vähämiko, 1997). Obviously, care must be taken to distinguish tolerance to airborne salt from that of soil salinity (e.g., Rozema et al, 1985;Greipsson and Davy, 1996;Hester, Mendelssohn, and McKee, 1996;Wang and Redmann, 1996). In contrast to plants of salt marshes, dune species are not plants of saline habitats and tolerance to salt exposure depends primarily on the prevention of salt accumulation in the shoot (Boyce, 1954;Crawford, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unfortunate because such variation in optimal germination time would be important to consider for an understanding of (a) the relative performance of different genotypes in natural populations and (b) the relative importance of differences in environmental conditions and in genetic composition for among‐population variation in phenotypic selection on germination timing. Information about optimal timing of germination could also be important when interpreting the results of common‐garden and reciprocal transplant experiments where germination of different genotypes is typically synchronized and seedlings planted on a given day (e.g., Antonovics and Primack, 1982; Schmid, 1985; Wang and Redmann, 1996; Fournier‐Level et al, 2011; Ågren et al, 2013; Ferris and Willis, 2018; Wadgymar et al, 2018; Lowry et al, 2019). If optimal germination time varies among genotypes, planting date should affect their relative fitness.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%