Abstract:Monocarpic senescence traits may influence adaptation to midseason drought by their effects on drought escape and dehydration avoidance. Adaptive attributes of two related cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes, contrasting in monocarpic leaf senescence, were evaluated under well‐watered and drought treatments in the field. Drought stress was imposed during flowering and pod filling for 19 consecutive days before irrigation was resumed. Delayed leaf senescence was expressed by genotype 8517 under both… Show more
“…The drought stress treatment did not receive water for 20 days [21] after stress induction while the non-stress treatment received water twice a week until physiological maturity.…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazil 5, NE 45 and NE 50 experienced a seed yield reduction of 83% and 36% respectively under soil moisture stress while WC 8, MU24C, Secow 5T, Secow 3B, MU15, IT84 and Secow 4w gave relatively higher yields. [21] reported that the reduction in seed yield under water stress was associated with the decrease in yield components such as number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod. Cowpea …”
Section: Yield and Its Components Indicators Of Drought Tolerance At mentioning
Moisture stress is a challenge to cowpea production in the drought prone areas of eastern and north eastern Uganda, with yield losses of up to 50% reported. Genotypes grown by farmers are not drought tolerant. This study was therefore, undertaken at Makerere University Agricultural Research Institute Kabanyolo to identify cowpea genotypes tolerant to drought. Thirty cowpea accessions comprising of Ugandan landraces and released varieties, Brazilian lines, Makerere University breeding lines, elite IITA germplasm and seven IITA drought tolerant lines as checks were screened for drought tolerance at vegetative and reproductive stages. The experiment was designed as a 2 × 37 factorial and laid out in a split-plot arrangement, 37 genotypes of cowpea at two soil moisture stress levels (T1, no stress and T2, severe stress) with all factorial combinations replicated two times in a screen house. The genotypes showed considerable variability in tolerance to drought. Genotypes were significantly different for chlorophyll content (P ≤ 0.01), efficiency of photosystem II (P ≤ 0.05), non-photochemical quenching (P ≤ 0.05), recovery (P ≤ 0.01), delayed leaf senescence (P ≤ 0.01), grain yield (P ≤ 0.01), 100 seed weight (P ≤ 0.05), number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod (P ≤ 0.001). There was a highly significant positive correlation between chlorophyll content and efficiency of photosystem II (r = 0.75, P ≤ 0.001) implying that chlorophyll content and efficiency of photosystem II could be used as efficient reference indicators in the selection of drought tolerant genotypes. Genotypes SECOW 5T, SECOW 3B, SECOW 4W, WC 30 and MU 24 C gave relatively high yields under stress and no stress conditions, maintained above mean chlorophyll content, efficiency of photosystem II and had good recovery scores from stress and thus were tolerant to drought stress induced at both How to cite this paper:
“…The drought stress treatment did not receive water for 20 days [21] after stress induction while the non-stress treatment received water twice a week until physiological maturity.…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazil 5, NE 45 and NE 50 experienced a seed yield reduction of 83% and 36% respectively under soil moisture stress while WC 8, MU24C, Secow 5T, Secow 3B, MU15, IT84 and Secow 4w gave relatively higher yields. [21] reported that the reduction in seed yield under water stress was associated with the decrease in yield components such as number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod. Cowpea …”
Section: Yield and Its Components Indicators Of Drought Tolerance At mentioning
Moisture stress is a challenge to cowpea production in the drought prone areas of eastern and north eastern Uganda, with yield losses of up to 50% reported. Genotypes grown by farmers are not drought tolerant. This study was therefore, undertaken at Makerere University Agricultural Research Institute Kabanyolo to identify cowpea genotypes tolerant to drought. Thirty cowpea accessions comprising of Ugandan landraces and released varieties, Brazilian lines, Makerere University breeding lines, elite IITA germplasm and seven IITA drought tolerant lines as checks were screened for drought tolerance at vegetative and reproductive stages. The experiment was designed as a 2 × 37 factorial and laid out in a split-plot arrangement, 37 genotypes of cowpea at two soil moisture stress levels (T1, no stress and T2, severe stress) with all factorial combinations replicated two times in a screen house. The genotypes showed considerable variability in tolerance to drought. Genotypes were significantly different for chlorophyll content (P ≤ 0.01), efficiency of photosystem II (P ≤ 0.05), non-photochemical quenching (P ≤ 0.05), recovery (P ≤ 0.01), delayed leaf senescence (P ≤ 0.01), grain yield (P ≤ 0.01), 100 seed weight (P ≤ 0.05), number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod (P ≤ 0.001). There was a highly significant positive correlation between chlorophyll content and efficiency of photosystem II (r = 0.75, P ≤ 0.001) implying that chlorophyll content and efficiency of photosystem II could be used as efficient reference indicators in the selection of drought tolerant genotypes. Genotypes SECOW 5T, SECOW 3B, SECOW 4W, WC 30 and MU 24 C gave relatively high yields under stress and no stress conditions, maintained above mean chlorophyll content, efficiency of photosystem II and had good recovery scores from stress and thus were tolerant to drought stress induced at both How to cite this paper:
“…The types are able to flower and mature before the on-set of mid-season moisture stress, thus escaping drought. Among tropical legumes, short-duration cultivars have been developed for cowpea (Gwathmey and Hall 1992;Hall and Patel 1992;Mligo and Singh 2006) and pigeonpea (Gwata and Siambi 2009;Silim and Omanga 2001). Short-duration cowpeas that can attain 2.0 t/ha within 60 to 70 d after planting have been reported (Ehlers and Hall 1997).…”
“…Certains ont porté sur l'appréciation de critères morpho-physiologiques tels que la taille et / ou le nombre de certains organes (longueur de l'épicotyle, longueur de la racine, surface foliaire, circonférence au collet, nombre de gousses, masse de matières sèches de feuilles ou de graines, biomasse totale, etc.) (Hall et Grantz, 1981 ;Gwathmey et Hall, 1992 ;Sarr et al, 2001 ;Ogbonnaya et al, 2003 ;Badiane et al, 2004). D'autres ont porté sur l'efficience d'utilisation de l'eau des plantes (Hall et al, 1990 ;Hall et al, 1994), ou se sont intéressés à la régulation des systèmes enzymatiques impliqués dans la détoxification des déchets métaboliques tels que les espèces actives de l'oxygène issus de la déshydratation des plantes (Brou et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…L'étude des réponses de ces plantes au déficit hydrique sur la base des p aram ètres physiologiques dérivant des échanges gazeux sont également nombreux (Schulze et Hall, 1982 ;Gwathmey et Hall, 1992 ;Tuba et al, 1996). Ceci est lié au fait que les effets du stress hydrique sur la photosynthèse des plantes s'observent de façon spectaculaire au niveau des échanges gazeux.…”
RESUMELe statut hydrique et les variations des échanges de CO 2 photosynthétique ont été étudiées chez deux variétés de niébé (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Les processus biochimiques susceptibles d'être à l'origine de ces variations ont été interprétés en relation avec les conditions hydriques de ces plantes. Les paramètres photosynthétiques associés aux échanges de CO 2 entre la plante et l'atmosphère ont été déterminés à l'aide de l'analyseur de gaz à capteurs infrarouges. L'intensité du stress hydrique a été évaluée par la mesure du potentiel hydrique et du contenu relatif en eau des plantes. La courbe de libération de l'eau obtenue en représentant le contenu relatif en eau en fonction du potentiel hydrique confirme la plus grande résistance de la variété Bambey 21 par rapport à TN88-63 au stress hydrique. Le stress hydrique induit la diminution de la conductance stomatique et du taux de photosynthèse nette tandis qu'il provoque une augmentation de la concentration intercellulaire de CO 2 dans la chambre sous-stomatique, lesquelles observations sont plus marquées chez TN88-63 que chez Bambey 21. L'interprétation intégrée des variations de ces paramètres permet de mieux montrer leur caractère discriminant pour la comparaison de variétés vis-à-vis du stress hydrique.
Mots clés :Photosynthèse, stress hydrique, échanges gazeux, niébé, Côte d'Ivoire.
ABSTRACT WATER STATUS AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITIES OF TWO COWPEA (Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALPERS) VARIETIES SUBMITTED TO WATER STRESSWater status and variations of photosynthetic CO 2 exchange parameters were studied in two cowpea varieties (Vigna unguiculata (L.)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.