2023
DOI: 10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of the Psychological Wellbeing Scale in Mexican medical students

Abstract: Introduction. The Ryff Scale of Psychological Well-Being is the most widely used instrument for assessing the eudemonic perspective of well-being. Although it has been adapted for the Spanish population, it has not been modified for health science students in the Mexican population. Objective. Adapt and obtain the psychometric properties of this scale for medical students in the Mexican population. Method. The study was conducted with 1,974 undergraduate students, 1,551 from the UNAM Medicine Faculty and 423 f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sample size of 30 people is adequate for a pilot study (Byrne et al, 2023). We used the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program to obtain the Cronbach's Alpha values because Cronbach's Alpha guarantees the dependability of the coefficient or the internal consistency of the scales (Hernández et al, 2023). Furthermore, an alpha value of equal to or greater than 0.8 is highly trustworthy, or greater than or equal to 0.7 is reasonable (Koo et al,), and greater than or equal to 0.6 reveals poor reliability (Xie et al, 2023).…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample size of 30 people is adequate for a pilot study (Byrne et al, 2023). We used the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program to obtain the Cronbach's Alpha values because Cronbach's Alpha guarantees the dependability of the coefficient or the internal consistency of the scales (Hernández et al, 2023). Furthermore, an alpha value of equal to or greater than 0.8 is highly trustworthy, or greater than or equal to 0.7 is reasonable (Koo et al,), and greater than or equal to 0.6 reveals poor reliability (Xie et al, 2023).…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 99%