Adaptation of the Dementia Attitudes Scale into Turkish

Çetinkaya, Aynur; Elbi, Hüseyin; Altan, Selim; Rahman, Süheyla; Aydemi̇r, Ömer

doi:10.29399/npa.24705

Cited by 9 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean total score of the scale was found as 56.22±10.12 (37-84). The mean scores for the dimensions were as "health responsibility": 16.84+3.19 (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), "physical activity": 10.89+2.35 (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), "dietary habits": 13.20+2.71 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), "stress management": 7.90+1.82 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While assessing each item, by dividing the number of the experts marking "1" or "2" by the number of all experts, the content validity index (CVI) for each item is obtained, and CVI values of higher than 0.8 indicate that the items are suitable in terms of content validity. 24 No item was removed from the scale. CVI, which was recommended to be 0.80 or higher by Davis, was found to be in the range of 0.85-1.00 for the items.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The KMO value needs to be higher than 0.5, while the Bartlett's test of sphericity result needs to be p<0.05. [19][20][21][22][23][24] The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated for the total scale and its dimensions to determine the reliability of the scale. In the Cronbach's alpha values, those above 0.7 were accepted as adequate.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the summary fit index values of the model, it is desired that the χ2/df value is smaller than 3, the RMSEA and SRMR values are smaller than 0.08, the CFI and IFI values are greater than 0.90, and the GFI value is greater than 0.95 for an acceptable fit. [19][20][21][22][23][24] The path diagram of the scale was created using the AMOS (version 20.0) program. Pearson's correlation test was utilized to determine the relationship between repeated measurements.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To assess the reliability of the Cardiac Health Behavior Scale, the Cronbach's alpha value was calculated. The intervals in assessing the Cronbach's alpha coefficient were reported as 0.00 < α< 0.40: not reliable, 0.40 < α< 0.60: reliable on a low level, 0.60 < α< 0.80: reliable and 0.80 < α< 1.00: highly reliable 16,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. In our study, the Cronbach's alpha value of the Cardiac Health Behavior Scale was found as 0.92, and this value showed that the scale had very high reliability.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Cardiac Health Behavior Scale

Serin

Sarıtaş

2021

Pak Heart J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This methodological study was carried out to test the validity and reliability of the Cardiac Health Behavior Scale (CHBS-21) for its use in Turkey among coronary artery patients. Methodology: The population included individuals visiting the cardiology polyclinic of a university hospital and being followed up with the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, while the sample consisted of 229 volunteering patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. The data were gathered by using a Patient Information Form that includes the descriptive characteristics of the participants and the Turkish form of the Cardiac Health Behavior Scale. SPSS (24.0) and AMOS were used in data analysis which included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was 0.92. The values for the dimensions of the scale were as 0.77 for health responsibility, 0.60 for physical activity, 0.76 for dietary habits, 0.71 for stress management and 0.85 for quitting smoking. The goodness of fit index values in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis were found as: X2=287.236, df= 176 (p<0.01), X2/df=1.63, RMSEA=0.053, GFI=0.90, CFI=0.94 and IFI=0.94. The model was found to show acceptable fit. Conclusion: The Cardiac Health Behavior Scale is a valid and reliable instrument that may be used in the assessment of medical statuses and risk factors of individuals with coronary artery disease. The effective implementation of the patient education will be improved by this measurement instrument.

show abstract