Adaptation of the Child Development Clinical Risk Indicators instrument to retrospective parent report

Machado, Fernanda Prada; Palladino, Ruth Ramalho Ruivo; Cunha, Maria Claudia

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/2014001in

Cited by 8 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(46 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The 18 months' cutoff was set for inclusion based on both tools' guidelines [13,23,27]. Furthermore, both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Council on Children with Disabilities recommend ASD-specific screening at 18 and 24 months [33].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the same time as this interview was performed and after verifying the selection criteria, the Clinical Risk Indicators for Early Childhood Development (IRDI) questionnaire [27,34] and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) [23] tools were administered. The tools were administered to all of the children's guardians by the same researcher.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is a retrospective questionnaire for parents and is indicated to be administered to children aged 18 months to 7 years [27,34]. The IRDI questionnaire is still under reliability and validity studies.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is common for speech therapists to be sought (at public or private services) by the parents of 3- or 4-year-old children with delayed language development or suspected (not confirmed) hearing loss, without any previous diagnosis or screening for ASDs [26,27]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Appropriateness of Using Autism Spectrum Disorders Screening Tools in a Hearing Evaluation Service

Machado

Palladino²,

Damasceno³

et al. 2016

Folia Phoniatr Logop

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim was to test the appropriateness of using autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening tools in a hearing evaluation service. Patients and Methods: Forty-one children with a mean age of 2.8 years, of whom 33 (80.5%) were boys, were evaluated in an audiological diagnostic service using ASD screening tools that had been validated for use in Brazil and recommended by the Ministry of Health. Results: 82% of the subjects referred to the hearing diagnostic service over 18 months did not show any type of hearing loss, but 60% had early signs of autism. 10% had hearing loss and were at risk for autism. Conclusion: The data emphasize the importance of the awareness and the training of professionals working with young children in ASD screening. The data also suggest that screening young children in a hearing evaluation service may contribute to more timely identification of children at risk for ASD.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Appropriateness of Using Autism Spectrum Disorders Screening Tools in a Hearing Evaluation Service

Machado

Palladino²,

Damasceno³

et al. 2016

Folia Phoniatr Logop

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It focuses on the observation of behaviors involved in the interaction of the mother-child dyad, between 0 and 18 months old. In a previous study (18) , the adaptation of IRDI to an IRDI questionnaire format was proposed for parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. The results obtained in the sample proved that it was possible to differentiate children with autism spectrum disorders from typical development children.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Questionário de indicadores clínicos de risco para o desenvolvimento infantil: avaliação da sensibilidade para transtornos do espectro do autismo

Machado

Lerner

Novaes

et al. 2014

Audiol., Commun. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo Avaliar a sensibilidade do IRDI-questionário para pais, para rastreamento de transtornos do espectro do autismo. Métodos Participaram do estudo 72 sujeitos, familiares de crianças na faixa etária de 2 anos e 11 meses a 7 anos e 7 meses, divididos em dois grupos: grupo pesquisa e grupo controle. O IRDI-questionário foi aplicado nos dois grupos estudados e a CARS-BR foi aplicada no grupo pesquisa. Os dados foram submetidos à análise estatística e, para a validade, foi realizado o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, entre o IRDI-questionário e a CARS-BR, somente para o grupo pesquisa. Na definição do ponto de corte do escore gerado pelo instrumento IRDI-questionário, foi utilizada a curva ROC e calculados os valores de sensibilidade, especificidade e valor preditivo positivo. Na análise de concordância para o IRDI-questionário, foi utilizado o coeficiente de Kappa e concordância total. Resultados O IRDI-questionário mostrou-se de fácil aplicação, rapidez no preenchimento e baixo custo. A análise da consistência interna das questões do instrumento apresentou bom índice. Na comparação com a CARS-BR, apresentou correlação positiva. A análise da curva ROC identificou bom desempenho. Conclusão A avaliação da sensibilidade do instrumento, para fins de rastreamento de transtornos do espectro do autismo, mostrou bons índices, a partir do ponto de corte estabelecido no estudo.

show abstract

A Study of Validity and Satisfaction of Tele-assessment

Kim¹,

Kang²,

Kim³

et al. 2023

Commun Sci Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study aims to examine the validity of two types of remote language screening tests (indirect questionnaire type vs direct observational type), and differences in performance of children as well as satisfaction of their mothers between these two types of remote language screening test. Methods: In total 40 children without any language deficits aged 3 to 6 and their mothers participated in this study. For statistical analysis, a Pearson correlation was conducted between the remote language screening tests (indirect questionnaire type and direct observation type); a PRES (Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale) to find out the concurrent validity, and a paired t-test was conducted to find out if there are significant differences in the performance of the children and satisfaction of their mothers between the two types of screening tests. Additionally as a qualitative analysis, mothers’ preference among two types of the test was asked using an open ended survey. Results: The two types of tests (indirect, direct) showed strong positive correlation with one another. Regarding concurrent validity, both test types showed strong positive correlation with a standardized language test as well. There was no significant difference between the two types in both the performance of the children and the satisfaction of mothers as well. However, 85% percent of mothers preferred the direct observation type citing better accuracy as their reasoning. Conclusion: It is hoped that remote language screening tests can contribute to the implementation of non-face-to-face screening in clinical settings since it is highly validated. Furthermore both two types of tests can be used and complement each other.

show abstract

Adaptation of the Child Development Clinical Risk Indicators instrument to retrospective parent report

Abstract: The items of the IRDI-questionnaire concern the main Autism Spectrum Disorders risk signs pointed out in literature. The parents' answers showed differences between the studied groups.

Cited by 8 publications

References 26 publications

Appropriateness of Using Autism Spectrum Disorders Screening Tools in a Hearing Evaluation Service

Appropriateness of Using Autism Spectrum Disorders Screening Tools in a Hearing Evaluation Service

Questionário de indicadores clínicos de risco para o desenvolvimento infantil: avaliação da sensibilidade para transtornos do espectro do autismo

A Study of Validity and Satisfaction of Tele-assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About