2010
DOI: 10.1080/07399330903052145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support for Arab Immigrant Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
47
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the model confi rms the instrument's original structure (Zimet et al, 1988), and it is consistent with the results of other studies of evidence of the validity of the scores (Aroian et al, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2011;Stewart et al, 2014;Wongpakaran et al, 2011). The threefactor model also demonstrates consistency with the theory of Zimet et al (1988), according to which the perceived social support construct is multidimensional to the extent that the social support comes from various sources of the individual's social group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the model confi rms the instrument's original structure (Zimet et al, 1988), and it is consistent with the results of other studies of evidence of the validity of the scores (Aroian et al, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2011;Stewart et al, 2014;Wongpakaran et al, 2011). The threefactor model also demonstrates consistency with the theory of Zimet et al (1988), according to which the perceived social support construct is multidimensional to the extent that the social support comes from various sources of the individual's social group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The MSPSS has been undergoing tests of its psychometric properties in various countries such as the United States (Aroian, Templin, & Ramaswamy, 2010), Portugal (Carvalho Pinto-Gouveia, Pimentel, Maia, & Mota Pereira, 2011), Thailand (Wongpakaran, Wongpakaran, & Ruktrakul, 2011) and the Republic of Malawi (Stewart, Umar, Tomenson, & Creed, 2014). In all of these studies, the scale's structure of three primary factors was confi rmed and the scale exhibited good internal consistency rates (Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.85 to 0.93).…”
Section: Propiedades Psicométricas De La Escala Multidimensional De Amentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) [27] is a commonly used instrument for measuring the perceived adequacy of social support from three specific sources: family, friends and significant others [26]. Each subscale has four items that are rated on a seven point scale in the English version or on a three point scale in the Arabic version.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the most appropriate tool for measuring perceived social support among patients waiting for OHS for many reasons. (1) It is the shortest and simplest tool available (12 items); (2) An Arabic version of MSPSS is available [27] and has been widely used among Arabic speaking people [26]. It has a high construct validity and internal consistency reliability with Cronbach’s alpha for total MSPSS = 0.74 [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measures for the study variables included a demographic and migration questionnaire, the Demands of Immigration Scale (DIS; Aroian, Tran, & Schappler-Morris, 1998), the Daily Hassles Scale (DHS: Kanner et al, 1981), an adapted version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS: Zimit, Dahlem, Zimet, & Farley, 1988) – the MSPSS-AW (Aroian, Templin, & Ramaswamy, 2010) – and the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977). Arabic language versions of the measures were developed through translation, back translation, and committee consensus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%