2017
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2017.813224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptability, Stability and Multivariate Selection by Mixed Models

Abstract: The aim of this work was to estimate the adaptability and stability of grain yield per hectare and percentage of crude protein of maize grains combined in an index, and to establish a multicharacter selection through mixed models based on an objective character and 15 auxiliary traits. The trials were conducted in the 2013/2014 agricultural year in four growing environments of the Rio Grande do Sul, BR state. The experimental design was randomized blocks arranged in a factorial scheme, being four growing sites… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most cited analytic measures HMPRVG and HMPRVG*GM marked HS612, HS507 and HPW430 as of high yield and better adaptability across major locations of this zone while HS615 & HS617 for low degree of adaptation. An overall agreement has been observed among analytic measures PRVG, MHVG, MHPRVG, GAI and average yield for the classification of wheat genotypes (Table 3) (de Pelegrin et al 2017). Variations among ranks of genotypes as per analytic adaptability measures observed as per various locations to highlight presence of cross over interactions effects for studied genotypes (Table 4).…”
Section: Analytic Measuressupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Most cited analytic measures HMPRVG and HMPRVG*GM marked HS612, HS507 and HPW430 as of high yield and better adaptability across major locations of this zone while HS615 & HS617 for low degree of adaptation. An overall agreement has been observed among analytic measures PRVG, MHVG, MHPRVG, GAI and average yield for the classification of wheat genotypes (Table 3) (de Pelegrin et al 2017). Variations among ranks of genotypes as per analytic adaptability measures observed as per various locations to highlight presence of cross over interactions effects for studied genotypes (Table 4).…”
Section: Analytic Measuressupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Due to the little information related to the genetic improvement of black oats, for the development of new genotypes, and biometric strategies that facilitate the selection process (Silveira et al 2010), the use of multicharacter selection tools provides the identification of complex characteristics, being able to consider components the selection of characters of the components of yield of the oats, that present indirect improvement in the indicators of physiological quality of the seeds. These methods allow for more homogeneity, minimal losses, assignment of multiple selection strategies and rapid gains during breeding and seed production (Pelegrin et al 2017;Sponchiado 2018;Szareski et al 2018;Carvalho et al 2019;Szareski et al 2019;Corazza et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The productive performance of maize hybrids is closely related to biotic and abiotic effects, as well as the intrinsic features of each genotype . The selection of the hybrid that better adapts to environmental conditions, and cultural traits becomes fundamental, as it presents great influence in the final yield (Cruz and Carneiro, 2003;Pelegrin et al, 2017;. According to Miranda Filho et al (1987), hybrids may be classified as single-cross, modified single cross, triple-cross, modified triple cross, double-cross, top cross and intervarietal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%