Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005255.pub2
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants

Abstract: Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants (Review)

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
35
0
0
0

Citation Types

0
5
0
0

Year Published

Range
2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
32
1
1
1

Relationship

0
35

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 35 publications

(5 citation statements)
references

References 29 publications

0
5
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Individual health care provider-driven feeding methods vary in terms of when to begin, how often to provide oral feedings, and the volume of oral feedings. Infant-driven feeding methods are individualized according to the infants' behaviors and are variously described as ad libitum, semi-on demand, on demand, or cue based (McCormick, Tosh, & McGuire, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cochrane Review team synthesized eight small, randomized clinical trials in which infant-driven feeding protocols were compared with health care provider-driven feeding protocols for relatively healthy preterm infants (McCormick et al, 2010). Among the studies, outcomes were mixed for the number of days from first to full oral feedings, PMA at discharge, average daily weight gain, and volume of feedings taken orally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation