“…41,73 We contend that each of these strategies lacks a logical biological rationale, locates authority in the expert, and undermines parental confidence in their capacity to read their infant's cues. 53,[89][90][91][92] Feed spacing does not protect against postnatal depression. 88 However, overly frequent or prolonged breastfeeding are signs of underlying feeding problems, which require appropriate identification and management.…”
The belief that behavioral intervention for sleep in the first 6 months of life improves outcomes for mothers and babies is historically constructed, overlooks feeding problems, and biases interpretation of data.
“…41,73 We contend that each of these strategies lacks a logical biological rationale, locates authority in the expert, and undermines parental confidence in their capacity to read their infant's cues. 53,[89][90][91][92] Feed spacing does not protect against postnatal depression. 88 However, overly frequent or prolonged breastfeeding are signs of underlying feeding problems, which require appropriate identification and management.…”
The belief that behavioral intervention for sleep in the first 6 months of life improves outcomes for mothers and babies is historically constructed, overlooks feeding problems, and biases interpretation of data.
“…However, studies cited as evidence that behavioural interventions in the first three to four months of life prevent or improve cry-fuss problems, improve maternal sleep duration, and improve behaviour and sleep in later childhood extrapolate data derived from older infants and their families back to the first few months of life [15,37]. These studies do not integrate the evidence that overly frequent or prolonged breastfeeding and excessive waking signal an underlying problem of poor milk transfer, caused by various feeding problems which require appropriate assessment and management, not feed spacing [38][39][40]. In addition, studies cited as evidence that behavioural interventions protect against postnatal depression are complex interventions with multiple covariates.…”
“…Cue based and semi demand feeding protocols have been described which rely on observations of the infant behavior, requiring clinicians to seek cues indicating feeding readiness instead of administering gavage feeds on a strict four hourly basis (McCain and Gartside, 2002). A Cochrane review in this area revealed limited evidence that this approach allows earlier attainment of oral feeds and earlier hospital discharge (McCormick et al, 2010).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Selection Of An Oral Interventionmentioning
There has been a significant increase in the survival of preterm infants in recent years. These infants often face difficulty acquiring the complex set of skills required for exclusive oral feeding due to a multiplicity of factors. This paper discusses the theory underlying the use of oral stimulation interventions with the preterm infant, and their role in facilitating the transition from tube (gavage) feeds to exclusive oral feeding and ultimately discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Oral stimulation interventions are defined and the range of interventions described in the current literature is examined. The challenges that exist in deciphering the research evidence supporting their use is explored and directions for future research are provided.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.