1984
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v64.2.427.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute leukemia with megakaryocytic differentiation: a study of 12 cases identified immunocytochemically

Abstract: Acute leukemia with megakaryocytic differentiation has been an uncommonly recognized disorder. We used specific monoclonal and polyclonal antibody reagents (HP1–1D antibody and anti-factor VIII antibody, respectively) and an immunocytochemical staining technique to identify the megakaryocytic nature of the leukemic cells of 12 patients who presented with acute leukemia. The leukemic cells of our patients demonstrated the presence of one or both of these platelet- and megakaryocyte-related antigens, but were ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Megakaryoblastic leukaemia is a myeloid malignancy whose prevalence has been previously underestimated: in some countries 8-10% of all cases of acute leukaemia are M-7 leukaemias (Bloomfield & Brunning 1985;Huang et al 1984;Ruiz-Argiielles et al 1986). The morphological features of the malignant cells have been described by the FAB group (Bennet et al 1985), but it seems that morphology alone has a limited value in the identification of the malignancy, hence immunological or electron microscopy features are required to define precisely M-7 acute leukaemias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Megakaryoblastic leukaemia is a myeloid malignancy whose prevalence has been previously underestimated: in some countries 8-10% of all cases of acute leukaemia are M-7 leukaemias (Bloomfield & Brunning 1985;Huang et al 1984;Ruiz-Argiielles et al 1986). The morphological features of the malignant cells have been described by the FAB group (Bennet et al 1985), but it seems that morphology alone has a limited value in the identification of the malignancy, hence immunological or electron microscopy features are required to define precisely M-7 acute leukaemias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first description of a leukaemia of megakaryoblasts by von Boros & Korenyi (1931), isolated cases or small series of this malignancy have been described (Breton-Gorius et al 1978;Devan, Rose & Greaves 1982;Huang et al 1984;Ruiz-Argiielles et al 1986). Recently, the French-American-British Cooperative Group (FAB) has proposed this type of leukaemia as the M-7 variant (Bennet et al 1985); it seems clear that in most cases of M-7 leukaemia, its identification can not be accomplished solely by the morphology of the blast cells (Bloomfield & Brunning 1985;Huang et al 1984;Ruiz-Argiielles et al 1986). The usefulness of monoclonal antibodies to thrombocytic-lineage specific antigens in the identification of M-7 leukaemias has now been proved (Huang et al 1984;Ruiz-Argiielles et al 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been postulated that cytogenetic changes in the long arm of chromosome 3 (3q) play a role in various hematologic malignancies such as thrombocythemia and dysmegakaryo~ytopoiesis.~-'~ However, Mecucci et al doubted this association and further speculated that some patients with 3q abnormalities might be diagnosed as having AM=. *' In fact, some patients with AMKL were shown to manifest abnormalities at 3q, i.e., inv(3) (q21q26)'5,'9 or del(3) (q21q26),2' and megakaryoblastic proliferation has also been associated with hematologic neoplasia, such as myelodysplastic syndromes2* and blastic crisis in chronic myeloproliferative disorder^.^,*,^^ However, it is unknown whether patients with abnormal megakaryoblastic proliferation manifest specific karyotypic abnormalities or not, since there are few reports of detailed chromosome studies of patients whose megakaryoblastic proliferation was identified by modern he- No. 4 matologic techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%