In recent years, MALDI imaging MS (IMS) has become a common method in lipid analytics. It enables visualization of the differential distribution of lipids varying only in their acyl chain with good spatial resolution ( у 7 m/pixel), as well as with high mass accuracy (<3 ppm rms) and high mass resolution ( R = 100.000 at m/z 200) ( 1 ). Although much work has been put into increasing the sensitivity of this method by the use of different matrix substances ( 2-7 ) or improved sample preparation ( 8-14 ) that achieves more homogeneous cocrystallization ( 15 ), reliability of the semiquantitative read out remains a matter of debate: Differences in the tissue structure ( 16 ) as well as specifi c matrix analyte interaction ( 17 ) are suspected to cause ion suppression followed by unreliable signal response ( 18 ). Ionization behaviors of specifi c molecules are hard to predict because they are infl uenced by a number of parameters ( 16,19 ). Abbreviations: 9-AA , 9-aminoacridine; AS, ceramide anchor with an alpha-hydroxy acyl chain and a sphingosine; Cst, cerebroside sulfotransferase; Cst f/f Pax8 Cre , specifi c knockout of cerebroside sulfotransferase in renal tubular epithelial cells; IMS, imaging MS; NP, ceramide anchor with a nonhydroxy acyl chain and a phytosphingosine; NS, ceramide anchor with a nonhydroxy acyl chain and a sphingosine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; ROI, region of interest; SM3, lactosylceramide II 3 -sulfate; SM4s, galactosylceramide I 3 -sulfate; UPLC, ultra-performance LC; wt, wild-type.