“…Several useful techniques for testing cellular mechanical properties have been proposed, including optical tweezers, atomic force microscopy, micropipette aspiration, , etc. − These techniques can accurately characterize cellular mechanical properties, but they struggle to strike a balance between precision and throughput. , Microfluidics, in which cell deformation is accomplished by fluid flow or geometric contraction, can enable high-throughput characterization of cell mechanics. ,− Microfluidic devices can be combined with automated image analysis to reduce the need for expert manipulation and simplify the operational steps. − In practice, however, cells are susceptible to blockage due to the heterogeneity of cell sample populations and differences in size and morphology, or they are affected by fluids that hinder high-quality imaging. , Some studies achieve cell deformation through optically triggered hydrogel-nanoactuator networks or external mechanical pressure-controlled hydrogel actuators and have achieved promising experimental results, but it remains challenging to automate manipulation and smart analysis from sample to result. ,, Alternatively, the development of magnetic platforms, such as magnetic digital microfluidics, has provided good ideas for rapid and automated manipulation of cell deformation. − Magnetic platforms can be widely used for biosensing and medical diagnostics due to their advantages, such as easy assembly, power-free operation, and being nondestructive, which allows operation in resource-poor environments for point-of-care detection …”