2012
DOI: 10.4172/2167-0269.1000102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actual Self-Image, Ideal Self-Image and the Relation between Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty

Abstract: Research ProblemThe model identifies factors that are likely to affect the development of the destination visitor image, such as destination location, and other destination environment cues. In addition, factors that are likely to moderate and mediate the relationship between self-congruity and travel behavior are identified and explained.Consumer research has shown that a consumer's attitude toward a product (and product purchase) is influenced by the matching of the product user image with the consumer's sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for studies (e.g., Killic and Sop, 2012; Sirgy and Su, 2000; Usakli and Baloglu, 2011; Zhang et al, 2014), which proposed the direct relationships between self-congruity and travelers’ post-consumption evaluations, this finding supports both Cifci et al (2016) and Japutra et al (2019), which also revealed indirect relationships between self-congruity and travelers’ post-consumption evaluations. Moreover, it has strengthened the limited evidence of previous studies (e.g., Abdallat, 2012; Chon, 1992; Kim and Thapa, 2017) on the positive relationship between self-congruity and satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for studies (e.g., Killic and Sop, 2012; Sirgy and Su, 2000; Usakli and Baloglu, 2011; Zhang et al, 2014), which proposed the direct relationships between self-congruity and travelers’ post-consumption evaluations, this finding supports both Cifci et al (2016) and Japutra et al (2019), which also revealed indirect relationships between self-congruity and travelers’ post-consumption evaluations. Moreover, it has strengthened the limited evidence of previous studies (e.g., Abdallat, 2012; Chon, 1992; Kim and Thapa, 2017) on the positive relationship between self-congruity and satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Although numerous studies in tourism and hospitality marketing widely are identified the relationship between satisfaction and self-congruity (Sop, 2020). Only a few studies (e.g., Abdallat, 2012; Chon, 1992; Kim and Thapa, 2017) have examined this relationship in the destination-marketing context, which might not serve the literature in the strict sense. Therefore, this study postulates that travelers who sense a high degree of congruence between their personalities and their perceived characteristics of the faith destinations will be satisfied for visiting these destinations.…”
Section: Self-congruity Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study introduces three variables, namely self-congruity, customer experience, and customer loyalty. Self-congruity consists of actual, ideal, social and ideal-social indicators (Abdallat, 2012;Haj-salem, Charles, Michon, & Oliveira, 2016;Koo, Cho, & Kim, 2014;Sirgy & Su, 2000). Customer experience in this study was measured using four indicators: feeling, relating, sensing, and thinking (Klaus & Maklan, 2013;Srivastava & Kaul, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-concept and product-image congruity were introduced by Gardner and Levy (1959) (Abdallat, 2012). It mainly focuses on the image projected by different products.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%