1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1427::aid-eqe876>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actual seismic response controlled building with semi‐active damper system

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents the "rst application of a semi-active damper system to an actual building. The Semi-active Hydraulic Damper (SHD) can produce a maximum damping force of 1000 kN with an electric power of 70 W. It is compact, so a large number of them can be installed in a single building. It is thus possible to control the building's response during a severe earthquake, because a large control force is obtained in comparison with a conventional active control system. This paper outlines the building,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
100
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass and stiffness values in eqs. (45) and (47) are similar to those corresponding to the Kajima-Sizuoka building presented in Kurata et al (1999); the damping matrix C has been computed as a Rayleigh damping matrix with a 2% damping ratio on the first and fifth modes [Chopra (2007)]. From the second-order model given in eq.…”
Section: Building Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass and stiffness values in eqs. (45) and (47) are similar to those corresponding to the Kajima-Sizuoka building presented in Kurata et al (1999); the damping matrix C has been computed as a Rayleigh damping matrix with a 2% damping ratio on the first and fifth modes [Chopra (2007)]. From the second-order model given in eq.…”
Section: Building Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us consider the particular five-story building model [23] corresponding to the mass, stiffness and damping parameters presented in Table 1. For this small-building problem, we first solve the LMI optimization problem P ∞ in (13) with the matrices A, B and E in (40) and the controlled-output matrices in (44) with n = 5 and the scaling factor α = 10 −7.3 , obtaining the H ∞ control gain matrix Table 2: Computation time (in seconds) corresponding to the H ∞ , energy-to-peak (ETP) and energy-tocomponentwise-peak (ETCWP) control gain matrices obtained for the five-story building.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 5 denote the mass and stiffness coefficients of the i-th story, respectively. For the building model used in this paper, the mass and stiffness values presented in Table 1 are considered [26]. To compute the damping matrix, a Rayleigh damping matrix with a 2% damping ratio on the first and fifth modes has been used [27], resulting: …”
Section: Structure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%