The susceptibilities of 120 clinical isolates of Brucella melitensis and 3 reference strains of the same species to six fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, PD 117596, PD 131628, PD 138312, PD 140248, and ciprofloxacin) were examined by agar dilution MIC methodology. Clinafloxacin was the most active compound tested (MIC at which 50% of strains tested were inhibited [MIC 50 ] and MIC 90 of 0.06 g/ml). Its level of activity was slightly higher than that of PD 117596 (MIC 50 and MIC 90 of 0.12 g/ml). PD 131628 and ciprofloxacin were less active than clinafloxacin, with MIC 50 s ranging from 0.12 to 0.25 g/ml and MIC 90 s of between 0.25 and 0.5 g/ml for the two compounds. The activity levels of PD 138312 and PD 140248, with MIC 50 s ranging from 1 to 2 g/ml and MIC 90 s of 4 to 8 g/ml, were lower than those of the other fluoroquinolones tested.Brucellosis remains a public health problem in several areas, such as Mediterranean countries. The treatment of brucellosis requires combined regimens of antibiotics and is conditioned by the fact that Brucella species are intracellular pathogens; thus, agents with a good capacity to penetrate macrophages are required for successful treatment. Current treatment of acute brucellosis combining tetracyclines and streptomycin or rifampin usually achieves excellent clinical and microbiological results. Nevertheless, variable percentages of failures and recurrences, ranging from 4 to 41% depending on the therapeutic regimens, are reported (1). In addition, these therapeutic regimens pose difficulties in patients' compliance because of their duration; moreover, tetracyclines are contraindicated for children of less than 8 years old and for pregnant women. Furthermore, since the incidence of tuberculosis in some areas of the world is increasing, the use of rifampin for nontuberculous patients in these areas should be avoided. Thus, it is felt that new antibiotics overcoming these problems would represent a significant therapeutic advancement in the treatment of brucellosis.Oral bioavailability of fluoroquinolones, high concentrations in tissues, evidence of intracellular penetration (leukocytes and macrophages) (5), and in vitro activity against Brucella spp. (7, 9) make these antimicrobial agents attractive for use against infections caused by intracellular bacteria such as Brucella spp. However, agents currently available in clinical practice (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, lomefloxacin, fleroxacin, and sparfloxacin) have moderate activity and lack effective bactericidal activity under intracellular conditions (pH 5) (7-9). Moreover, therapeutic failures caused by the development of resistance to these agents by Brucella melitensis have also been reported (3). Therefore, these fluoroquinolones should not be considered for primary treatment of brucellosis. Thus, it is important to evaluate new fluoroquinolones with higher intrinsic activity levels that might overcome these problems. Clinafloxacin The MICs of the antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method by using prev...