“…A multifactorial approach was adopted to determine the assignment of an individual to an age-at-1 The accuracy of age-at-death prediction varies depending on reference sample composition [see Bocquet-Apple and Masset (1982), as well as overviews by Jackes (2000) and Milner et al (2008)], as well as genetic and epigenetic factors, such as ethnicity, nutrition, activity, and health status. For the present analysis, and in line with research already conducted on this population (e.g., Lieverse, 2005Lieverse, , 2010Lieverse 2007;Lieverse et al, 2007aLieverse et al, ,b, 2009Waters-Rist et al, 2010Waters-Rist, 2011), individuals were divided into the following age-at-death categories: adolescent (<20 years), young adult (20-34 years), middle adult (35-49 years), and old adult (501 years) ( Table 1). The pelvic methods used in this analysis, specifically the Suchey-Brooks method (Brooks and Suchey 1990) for pubic symphyses and the Meindl and Lovejoy (1989) method for auricular surface analyses, have been tested in modern Asian populations, with mixed results (Sakaue 2006, Schmitt 2004.…”