2014
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22533
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone quality in prehistoric, cis‐baikal forager femora: A micro‐CT analysis of cortical canal microstructure

Abstract: Bone quality, a contributor to bone strength, is determined by structural and mechanical properties, which may be analyzed by gross and/or microscopic methods. Variables that contribute to bone quality, such as porosity, can provide insight into the health and lifestyles of people in prehistory. This study tests the ability of microcomputed tomography (µCT) to capture and characterize cortical canal systems in archaeological bone. Seven variables and 71 femora are analyzed to explore bone dynamics in prehistor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although cortical bone microstructure provides much information on the dynamics of bone growth and remodeling, with potential functional implications (e.g., see Martin, Burr, & Sharkey, ), it has been relatively less studied in comparative anthropological contexts. This is in part because of the necessity for physical sections, although recent improvements in very high‐resolution computed tomography may make noninvasive assessments of at least some parameters more feasible in the future (Faccia et al, ). A histomorphometric study of cortical bone in 10 late archaic and early anatomically modern Homo sapiens lower limb specimens, published in the AJPA (Abbott, Trinkaus, & Burr, ), concluded that osteon size and remodeling rates were lower than those of more recent humans, which was interpreted as reflecting higher mechanical loads (following the “Mechanostat” model proposed by Frost, ).…”
Section: Recent Trends (1990–present)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cortical bone microstructure provides much information on the dynamics of bone growth and remodeling, with potential functional implications (e.g., see Martin, Burr, & Sharkey, ), it has been relatively less studied in comparative anthropological contexts. This is in part because of the necessity for physical sections, although recent improvements in very high‐resolution computed tomography may make noninvasive assessments of at least some parameters more feasible in the future (Faccia et al, ). A histomorphometric study of cortical bone in 10 late archaic and early anatomically modern Homo sapiens lower limb specimens, published in the AJPA (Abbott, Trinkaus, & Burr, ), concluded that osteon size and remodeling rates were lower than those of more recent humans, which was interpreted as reflecting higher mechanical loads (following the “Mechanostat” model proposed by Frost, ).…”
Section: Recent Trends (1990–present)mentioning
confidence: 99%