1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)95857-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity coefficients, interfacial tensions and retention in reversed-phase liquid chormatography on LiChrosorb RP-18 with methanol-water mixtures

Abstract: SUMMARYLiterature data on activity coefficients of various solutes in water, of some tetraalkyl compounds in methanol-water mixtures and of water in organic solvents have been correlated with the product of the molecular surface area of the solute and the solute-solvent interfacial tension at ambient temperature. The conditions for which this relationship holds are examined.The retentions of apolar solutes have been measured on LiChrosorb RP-IS using methanol-water mixtures as eluents at 25°C. The results are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soils SP 14696 (denoted as Soil I) and SP loads lower amount of solutes each time compared to 20697 (Soil II) were purchased from LUFA, Speyer, conventional batch methods. Based on a displaceGermany, and soil GSE 17201 (Soil III) was from ment adsorption model [13] in which the solute is Bayer Landwirtschaftszentrum, Monheim, Germany. distributed between a homogeneous interfacial layer Their main characteristics are listed in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soils SP 14696 (denoted as Soil I) and SP loads lower amount of solutes each time compared to 20697 (Soil II) were purchased from LUFA, Speyer, conventional batch methods. Based on a displaceGermany, and soil GSE 17201 (Soil III) was from ment adsorption model [13] in which the solute is Bayer Landwirtschaftszentrum, Monheim, Germany. distributed between a homogeneous interfacial layer Their main characteristics are listed in Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation has been widely used to describe the changes of the retention factor k with the methanol fraction of the mobile phase [13,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. It is correct for the majority of analytes in the range of 0.2-0.8 j, but for lower and higher concentrations often nonlinearity occurs [65,[68][69][70][71][72][73], for ionic solutes even at medium modifier concentrations [74][75][76].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…incomplete solvation, stronger folding and collapsing of the alkyl chains [69,70,[85][86][87]. Similar conformational changes are not probable on calixarene phases because of their high degree of internal order.…”
Section: Properties Of the Single Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Log γ ∞ 1,water was from Hammers et al (1982); log K oc data were the average values taken from Sabljic et al (1995), Kaune et al (1998), and Liu and Qian (1995); the intercepts log k ′ w were obtained from Eq. [6], log k ′ = log k ′ w − S φ, on GSE 17201 reference soil and on Hypersil ODS at 25.0°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilayer formation of solute molecules on the soil surface is thus precluded. Based on a displacement adsorption model in which the solute is distributed between a homogeneous interfacial layer and the bulk aqueous phase (Hammers et al, 1982), the capacity factor of a solute on the soil can be described as: logknormalw=logtrue(n1,sorbed/normaln1,watertrue)=logtrue(x1,sorbedn2,sorbed/normalx1,watern2,watertrue)=logtrue(n2,sorbed/normaln2,watertrue)+logtrue(γ1,water/γ1,interfacetrue)where subscript 1 denotes solute, and 2 denotes water. The terms n 1,sorbed (or n 2,sorbed ) and n 1,water (or n 2,water ) are the mole numbers of adsorbed solute (or water) and of solute (or water) in the eluent, respectively.…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%