2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00821-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of soil organic partition coefficients: from retention factors measured by soil column chromatography with water as eluent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for adsorbate molecules with a higher water solubility, the k d values are always smaller than those of less water soluble adsorbate molecules, i.e. Thus, this study successfully eliminated the gap between the K OC and K OM values and both obtained log K OC and log K OM values in this study are signicantly greater than those of the natural soil system as well so far reported literature values, 28,30 as shown in Table 5. However, due to this distribution of non-ionic organic pollutants into the organic phase of the adsorbent in soil-water system, again the total organic content has to be corrected, as shown in Table 4, i.e.…”
Section: Uptake Of Organic Pollutants (Btex)supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, for adsorbate molecules with a higher water solubility, the k d values are always smaller than those of less water soluble adsorbate molecules, i.e. Thus, this study successfully eliminated the gap between the K OC and K OM values and both obtained log K OC and log K OM values in this study are signicantly greater than those of the natural soil system as well so far reported literature values, 28,30 as shown in Table 5. However, due to this distribution of non-ionic organic pollutants into the organic phase of the adsorbent in soil-water system, again the total organic content has to be corrected, as shown in Table 4, i.e.…”
Section: Uptake Of Organic Pollutants (Btex)supporting
confidence: 61%
“…For estimation of the success of the outlined procedure development, very valuable information comes from: soil leaching column chromatographic techniques for estimation of the leaching behavior of pesticides in soil [27]; soil column chromatography used for correlation between capacity factors and soil organic partition coefficients of pesticides [28]; derivation of retention equations or estimation of soil organic partition coefficients of organic chemicals in soil column chromatography with methanol -water [29] or water as eluents [30]; and also from prediction of soil organic carbon partition coefficients by soil column liquid chromatography [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PC1 vs. PC2 score plot show the presence of at least two groups. The first one is located at the right side of the plot consisting of mostly polyaromatic hydrocarbons (compounds 7, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], while the benzodiazepines and the rest of phenols and aromatic compounds are located at the left side of the graph. Two compounds: p-aminobenzoic acid (17) and p-anisidine (11) …”
Section: Exploratory Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly typical reversed-phase (RP) modalities have been used so far, with different combination of sorbents such as: chemically bonded octadecyl silica (RP-18) [7][8][9], cyano-modified silica (CN) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], tetramethylamonium-(TMA) [9], aminopropyl- [11], as well as humic acidmodified silica [11,[16][17][18]. In addition, soil materials have been used as sorbents with great success [19][20][21] providing valuable insights into mobility of analytes in different soils [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%