2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activities of Ni-based nano catalysts for CO2–CH4 reforming prepared by polyol process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CH 4 and CO 2 conversion of 25% and 11.3%, respectively, was achieved with 15% Ni/γ‐Al 2 O 3 ‐packed DBD at SIE 4.8 J mL −1 . This is mainly due to the smaller particle size and higher surface area of 15Ni/γ‐Al 2 O 3 , which provides more active sites, large contact area, and higher number of filamentary microdischarges . On the same note, the low conversion obtained over 15Ni/ZSM‐5 may be due to its low‐dielectric nature, lowest charge transfers per half cycle, and large Ni particles ( [ d ¯ ] = 22 mm ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH 4 and CO 2 conversion of 25% and 11.3%, respectively, was achieved with 15% Ni/γ‐Al 2 O 3 ‐packed DBD at SIE 4.8 J mL −1 . This is mainly due to the smaller particle size and higher surface area of 15Ni/γ‐Al 2 O 3 , which provides more active sites, large contact area, and higher number of filamentary microdischarges . On the same note, the low conversion obtained over 15Ni/ZSM‐5 may be due to its low‐dielectric nature, lowest charge transfers per half cycle, and large Ni particles ( [ d ¯ ] = 22 mm ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naeem et al [17] 353 have found a severe deactivation on the catalyst from carbon deposition. Encapsulation carbon on 354 metal particles significantly decreased catalytic activity but filamentous carbon with metal particles…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalyst obtained via ammonia evaporation method had stronger metal−support interaction and better nickel dispersion compared to that obtained via conventional impregnation. Naeem et al [17] have found a severe deactivation on the catalyst from carbon deposition. Encapsulation carbon on metal particles significantly decreased catalytic activity but filamentous carbon with metal particles being on the top of the carbon could be still active and exposed by reactants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, carbon deposition and sintering of active metal component are the major reasons that alter the textural properties of the catalyst during DRM reaction. 29 However, it is apparent that the Sc-promoted catalysts presented a relatively smaller variation in S BET and PV in comparison to non-promoted catalyst. This important observation signifies that, under similar reaction conditions, the Sc-promoted catalysts showed better resistance toward carbon deposition and sintering than non-promoted catalyst.…”
Section: Temperature-programmed Reduction (H 2 -Tpr)mentioning
confidence: 97%