Activist Engineering: Changing Engineering Practice By Deploying Praxis

Abstract

In this paper, we reflect on current notions of engineering practice by examining some of the motives for engineered solutions to the problem of climate change. We draw on fields such as science and technology studies, the philosophy of technology, and environmental ethics to highlight how dominant notions of apoliticism and ahistoricity are ingrained in contemporary engineering practice. We argue that a solely technological response to climate change does not question the social, political, and cultural tenet of infinite material growth, one of the root causes of climate change. In response to the contemporary engineering practice, we define an activist engineer as someone who not only can provide specific engineered solutions, but who also steps back from their work and tackles the question, What is the real problem and does this problem "require" an engineering intervention? Solving complex problems like climate change requires radical cultural change, and a significant obstacle is educating engineers about how to conceive of and create "authentic alternatives," that is, solutions that differ from the paradigm of "technologically improving" our way out of problems. As a means to realize radically new solutions, we investigate how engineers might (re)deploy the concept of praxis, which raises awareness in engineers of the inherent politics of technological design. Praxis empowers engineers with a more comprehensive understanding of problems, and thus transforms technologies, when appropriate, into more socially just and ecologically sensitive interventions. Most importantly, praxis also raises a radical alternative rarely considered-not "engineering a solution." Activist engineering offers a contrasting method to contemporary engineering practice and leads toward social justice and ecological protection through problem solving by asking not, How will we technologize our way out of the problems we face? but instead, What really needs to be done?

Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential

“…One barrier to address will be the engineer/scientist stereotype: the socially awkward nerd with a narrow set of technical interests and a passivity or even an active distancing over broader sociopolitical issues (Beder, 1999; Cech, 2013; Florman, 1997; Karwat, 2019; Karwat et al, 2015; Riley, 2008). There is also a professionalizing culture to overcome and the commitment required by engineers and scientists to their employers—often a corporation—that seek normative control over their hearts and minds (Kunda, 2009; C. W. Mills, 1956).…”

Ingeniería para la construcción de paz: una reflexión preliminar para procesos tecnocientíficos de resiliencia territorial

“…Está orientado hacia prácticas de ingeniería que mejoran la equidad de género, racial, de clase y cultural; además, son democráticas, no opresivas y no violentas. La revista atiende a las y los ingenieros en ejercicio, educadores y una audiencia general Esta praxis nace de la necesidad de generar enfoques situados, contextuales y conviviales 6 de la tecnología en territorios donde la resiliencia de las comunidades es un proceso colectivo para la transformación, es decir, construirla también como una ingeniería activista (Barkin, 2019;Illich, 1973;Karwat, Eagle, Wooldridge y Princen, 2014). En esta, el diálogo de saberes, tanto el conocimiento de la academia (explícito) como el de las comunidades (tácito) cobra un papel fundamental, ligado a las epistemologías y ontologías de los grupos sociales cocreadores de los procesos de CTeI.…”

An Approach to Integrating Health Disparities within Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Education

“…wherein engineers strive to transform existing and future technologies into community-based interventions and solutions. 16 Introducing undergraduates to biomedical areas of communal need that can be remedied via engineering technology will empower BMEs to confront the pervasiveness of health disparities in the USA and will also expand the knowledge base of undergraduates who seek employment in federal agencies, biomedical/clinical technology companies and start-up ventures with community-based platforms.…”

“…3,16,22 Thus, the current project has leveraged the historical mission of access-and-excellence 22 at The City College of New York (CCNY) to incentivize the integration of health disparities into undergraduate curricula. CCNY is the City College flagship campus of the City University of New York (CUNY), which is comprised of 24 campuses within New York City (community colleges to doctorate-awarding colleges).…”