2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well worth pointing out that, in theoretical analyses, a reasonable assumption for the slip surface is fundamental to the study of active earth pressure. In this regard, many types of the planar slip surface have been proposed so far, such as lines (Coulomb and Rankine theory), segment lines [5,19], circles [20], catenary lines [21], and curves composed of a line and a logarithmic spiral [22,23]. Nevertheless, little attention in previous researches has been paid to the change of the slip surface, with which the narrow soil behind a retaining wall varies with the width of the backfill.…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well worth pointing out that, in theoretical analyses, a reasonable assumption for the slip surface is fundamental to the study of active earth pressure. In this regard, many types of the planar slip surface have been proposed so far, such as lines (Coulomb and Rankine theory), segment lines [5,19], circles [20], catenary lines [21], and curves composed of a line and a logarithmic spiral [22,23]. Nevertheless, little attention in previous researches has been paid to the change of the slip surface, with which the narrow soil behind a retaining wall varies with the width of the backfill.…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese studies found that the reason for the reduction of the lateral earth pressure acting on a retaining wall with narrow backfills is mostly due to soil arching effects. Additionally, taking the advantage of simplicity of the formulation, analytical solutions also have been derived for retaining walls with narrow backfills under the assumption that failure surfaces are planar and segmental [5,19]. All these methods are useful for assessing the earth pressure for retaining walls with narrow backfills though with various degrees of approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside widely known theories like Rankine (1857) and Coulomb (1776) there are various study considering different methods for lateral earth pressure distribution. Some of which are limit equilibrium method (Greco, 2013;Leśniewska & Mróz, 2000;Morisson & Ebeling, 1995), limit analysis method (Chen & Liu, 1990;Shiau, Augarde, Lyamin, & Sloan, 2009;Yang, 2007), numerical methods (Chugh & Labuz, 2011;Lee, Chae, Kim, Jo, & Park, 2015) and experimental methods (Chevalier, Combe, & Villard, n.d.;Tsagareli, 1965). Contrary to the Coulomb's and Rankine's methods, in many studies it is stated that active earth pressure distribution is nonlinear due to the arching effect (Ertuğrul, 2013;Handy, 1985;Nadukuru & Michalowski, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fan and Fang present a numerical study on the behaviour of active earth pressures behind a rigid retaining wall with limited backfill space of various geometries [8]. On the basis of the limit equilibrium method with planar slip surfaces, Greco presents an analytical method to obtain a solution for the active thrust exerted by backfill of narrow width on gravity retaining walls [9]. Greco presents a limit equilibrium method, for calculating the active thrust on fascia retaining walls, where common methods cannot be used owing to the narrowness of the backfill [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%