2001
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-19-1289-2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active spacecraft potential control for Cluster – implementation and first results

Abstract: Abstract. Electrostatic charging of a spacecraft modifies the distribution of electrons and ions before the particles enter the sensors mounted on the spacecraft body. The floating potential of magnetospheric satellites in sunlight very often reaches several tens of volts, making measurements of the cold (several eV) component of the ambient ions impossible. The plasma electron data become contaminated by large fluxes of photoelectrons attracted back into the sensors.The Cluster spacecraft are equipped with em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the minimum of this index occurs for potentials close to the critical potential (for which N 0 =N ) which typically lies in the range 2-6 V, the higher value corresponding to the solar wind. This range agrees well with the capabilities of existing active potential control devices as employed, for example, on Polar (PSI experiment, Moore et al (1995), with a bias potential ∼2 V) and Cluster (ASPOC experiment, Torkar et al, 2001, with a bias potential ∼3-7 V). Such devices basically emit a positive ion beam to counter the positive charge and manage to dynamically stabilize the potential to values close to the bias value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Also, the minimum of this index occurs for potentials close to the critical potential (for which N 0 =N ) which typically lies in the range 2-6 V, the higher value corresponding to the solar wind. This range agrees well with the capabilities of existing active potential control devices as employed, for example, on Polar (PSI experiment, Moore et al (1995), with a bias potential ∼2 V) and Cluster (ASPOC experiment, Torkar et al, 2001, with a bias potential ∼3-7 V). Such devices basically emit a positive ion beam to counter the positive charge and manage to dynamically stabilize the potential to values close to the bias value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…(The sketch shows the simplified case, when the magnetic field and the wake is in the spacecraft spin plane.) special circumstances: low spacecraft potential due to operation of the artificial spacecraft control, ASPOC (Torkar et al, 2001), and operation of CODIF (Rème et al, 2001) in lowenergy mode (0.7-25 eV). Events where these circumstances are fulfilled on one spacecraft at the same time as wakes are seen in the electric field signature on another spacecraft are rare.…”
Section: Methods Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences in current emitted by the EDI instrument, particularly notable for spacecraft 3 that is used here in six cases) lead to significant variations of a. For seven events, the spacecraft potential data are ignored, as in these cases the density determination becomes more complicated because of an artificial spacecraft potential control by ASPOC (Torkar et al, 2001). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%