2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714936115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments

Abstract: How useful can machine learning be in a quantum laboratory? Here we raise the question of the potential of intelligent machines in the context of scientific research. A major motivation for the present work is the unknown reachability of various entanglement classes in quantum experiments. We investigate this question by using the projective simulation model, a physics-oriented approach to artificial intelligence. In our approach, the projective simulation system is challenged to design complex photonic quantu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
262
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
262
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Henceforth, we will focus on (two-layer) PS, due to its simpler update rule (equation (8)) and to investigate the potential of t-PS. Indeed, GridWorld has been already investigated in the context of PS [44], a relevant example being the design of optical experiments, which was shown to be representable as a generalized GridWorld [43]. Furthermore, note that for both SARSA and Q-learning we numerically observed a performance very similar to PS.…”
Section: Testing the Architecturementioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Henceforth, we will focus on (two-layer) PS, due to its simpler update rule (equation (8)) and to investigate the potential of t-PS. Indeed, GridWorld has been already investigated in the context of PS [44], a relevant example being the design of optical experiments, which was shown to be representable as a generalized GridWorld [43]. Furthermore, note that for both SARSA and Q-learning we numerically observed a performance very similar to PS.…”
Section: Testing the Architecturementioning
confidence: 65%
“…PS is a recent, physically-motivated RL model [26], which has already found several applications ranging from robotics [41] and quantum error correction [7] to the study of collective behavior [42] and automated experiment design [43]. Decision-making in PS occurs in a network of clips that constitutes the agent's episodic and compositional memory (ECM) (figure 2(a)).…”
Section: Projective Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted that this indeterministic aspect is a fundamental feature of the model in the same way in which other well-known models in physics, such as the ones referred to at the end of section 3.1, are fundamentally indeterministic. In projective simulation, the indeterminism is not added on top of an 50 Recent developments include applications in robotics (Hangl et al 2016(Hangl et al , 2017a and in the design of novel quantum experiments (Melnikov et al 2018).…”
Section: Projective Simulation: Free Agency Under Indeterminismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for optimal control can naturally be formulated as reinforcement learning (RL) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], a discipline of machine learning. RL has been used in the context of quantum control [17], to design experiments in quantum optics [20], and to automatically generate sequences of gates and measurements for quantum error correction [16,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%