2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jb016480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Convergence of the India‐Burma‐Sunda Plates Revealed by a New Continuous GPS Network

Abstract: The Rakhine (Arakan)‐Bangladesh megathrust, along which the Indian and Burma plates collide, is assumed by some to be inactive/aseismic due to the lack of notable interplate earthquakes in the modern instrumental catalog. However, geological and historical evidence of the great 1762 Arakan earthquake suggest the megathrust can produce M~8 events that could adversely affect the lives of millions of people in the region. To investigate the seismogenic potential and determine the slip budget of the megathrust, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
131
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
131
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the scatter in arc perpendicular motion across the detachment leads to ambiguity whether the BMT is either locked or creeping in aseismic manner. This observation differs with the results of Steckler et al (2016) and Mallick et al (2019) that the subduction between India and Sunda is active in the frontal part, which makes the region highly vulnerable for seismic activity. Moreover, the rate of subduction is significantly lower in our analysis which correspondingly brings down the associated seismic hazard in this region.…”
Section: 1029/2019tc006034contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose that the scatter in arc perpendicular motion across the detachment leads to ambiguity whether the BMT is either locked or creeping in aseismic manner. This observation differs with the results of Steckler et al (2016) and Mallick et al (2019) that the subduction between India and Sunda is active in the frontal part, which makes the region highly vulnerable for seismic activity. Moreover, the rate of subduction is significantly lower in our analysis which correspondingly brings down the associated seismic hazard in this region.…”
Section: 1029/2019tc006034contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, high-resolution seismic and multibeam survey profiles from the offshore of Myanmar do not support active accretion in the sedimentary wedge, except the presence of some massive landslides along the Myanmar coastline, suggesting faster rate of uplift of the Arakan Range (Rangin, 2019). Interestingly, this arc normal motion is significantly lower than the motion estimated by previous studies (Mallick et al, 2019;Steckler et al, 2016).…”
Section: Crustal Deformation and Strain Accumulation Across The Ibacontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…In the CB, the newly discovered YUF and KF are able to accommodate surplus strike‐slip deformation along the N‐S direction not taken up by the Sagaing Fault. The CB would not be treated as a rigid block in future geodetic analyses (Mallick et al, 2019). Overall, the strike‐slip deformation dominates to the east of the KBF, while the shortening is mainly confined to the west of the KBF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the investigations were hampered by no obvious tectonic landform due to sedimentation and/or rapid erosion. Steckler et al, 2016;Searle et al, 2017;Mallick et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019). The tectonic units are delimited by different colors.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoothing factor α and weight factor γ can be found by numerically finding the minimum of the ABIC function (Fukahata et al, 2004;Funning et al, 2014;Mallick et al, 2019) as follows:…”
Section: Glacier Mass Balance Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%