2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89649-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Assessment: Assessing Scientific Inquiry

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response, an impressive body of literature has accumulated on the various approaches and interventions that have been shown to improve student learning, confidence, self-esteem, academic performance, and persistence through STEM. These include active teaching and student feedback through focus groups, surveys and interviews, increased course structure, replacement of traditional introductory labs with research projects, course-based research experiences, development and implementation of effective assessment techniques, student advising/mentoring, formation of learning communities, increased availability of financial support, and peer tutoring ( Allen and Tanner, 2005 ; Jacobs-Sera et al ., 2009 ; Austin, 2011 ; Goldey et al ., 2012 ; Singer et al ., 2012 ; Depass and Chubin, 2014 ; Freeman et al ., 2014 ; Williams et al ., 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, an impressive body of literature has accumulated on the various approaches and interventions that have been shown to improve student learning, confidence, self-esteem, academic performance, and persistence through STEM. These include active teaching and student feedback through focus groups, surveys and interviews, increased course structure, replacement of traditional introductory labs with research projects, course-based research experiences, development and implementation of effective assessment techniques, student advising/mentoring, formation of learning communities, increased availability of financial support, and peer tutoring ( Allen and Tanner, 2005 ; Jacobs-Sera et al ., 2009 ; Austin, 2011 ; Goldey et al ., 2012 ; Singer et al ., 2012 ; Depass and Chubin, 2014 ; Freeman et al ., 2014 ; Williams et al ., 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%