2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of the Nrf2-regulated antioxidant cell response inhibits HEMA-induced oxidative stress and supports cell viability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
59
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(101 reference statements)
3
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our effort to understand how AA regulates osterix expression by transcriptional regulation, we focused on the nuclear factor-E2-related factor (NFE2, also known as Nrf) pathway since Nrf regulation of antioxidant genes via antioxidant response elements (ARE) is well known (83) . Studies in a number of laboratories have shown that to combat DNA damage by electrophiles and ROS, cells have developed elaborate defense mechanisms that involve coordinated function of genes encoding drug detoxification, GSH metabolism, and protection against oxidative damage (8486) . Furthermore, the transcriptional activation of many of these genes involves the binding of Nrf to AREs to induce transcriptional activation (87) .…”
Section: Molecular Pathways For Vitamin C Action On Bone Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our effort to understand how AA regulates osterix expression by transcriptional regulation, we focused on the nuclear factor-E2-related factor (NFE2, also known as Nrf) pathway since Nrf regulation of antioxidant genes via antioxidant response elements (ARE) is well known (83) . Studies in a number of laboratories have shown that to combat DNA damage by electrophiles and ROS, cells have developed elaborate defense mechanisms that involve coordinated function of genes encoding drug detoxification, GSH metabolism, and protection against oxidative damage (8486) . Furthermore, the transcriptional activation of many of these genes involves the binding of Nrf to AREs to induce transcriptional activation (87) .…”
Section: Molecular Pathways For Vitamin C Action On Bone Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(83) Studies in a number of laboratories have shown that to combat DNA damage by electrophiles and ROS, cells have developed elaborate defense mechanisms that involve coordinated function of genes encoding drug detoxification, GSH metabolism, and protection against oxidative damage. (84)(85)(86) Furthermore, the transcriptional activation of many of these genes involves the binding of Nrf to AREs to induce transcriptional activation. (87) Because the proximal promoter of the osterix gene contains AREs that are highly conserved among mice, rats and humans, we examined if osterix gene transcription was regulated by Nrf binding to its promoter.…”
Section: Molecular Pathways For Vitamin C Action On Bone Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upregulation of HMOX-1 has previously been reported at the mRNA level, in dental pulp cells exposed to TEGDMA (19,41,42). Upregulation of HMOX-1 is also reported in cells exposed to UDMA, HEMA, and Bis-GMA (34)(35)(36)(37)(38). Heme oxygenase 1 (and subsequent iron sequestration) is therefore likely to play an important role in maintaining the redox balance in cells exposed to methacrylates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nuclear factor (erythroid‐derived 2)‐like 2 also controls expression of other stress‐related factors, such as detoxification enzymes, proteasomes, and heat‐shock proteins . Altered levels of proteins associated with NRF2 activity have been observed in cells exposed to hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) , bisphenol A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate (Bis‐GMA) , and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) , and upregulation of NRF‐2 associated factors is suggested to be a general protective mechanism in cells exposed to methacrylates .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although oxidative stress in HEMA‐exposed cells may cause Keap1 activation, a direct binding to the cysteines is also likely based on the reported spontaneous adduct formation with GSH through the cysteine residue . Although both mechanisms of activation by HEMA are possible, and previously suggested, there are currently no published studies that clearly describe the underlying mechanism. The knowledge of HEMA as a sensitizer, however, supports the ability to form adducts with proteins and possibly direct interaction with Keap1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%