2017
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of the CREB/c-Fos Pathway during Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in the Cerebellum Granular Layer

Abstract: The induction of long-term potentiation and depression (LTP and LTD) is thought to trigger gene expression and protein synthesis, leading to consolidation of synaptic and neuronal changes. However, while LTP and LTD have been proposed to play important roles for sensori-motor learning in the cerebellum granular layer, their association with these mechanisms remained unclear. Here, we have investigated phosphorylation of the cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and activation of the immediate early ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a significant decrease in the number of c-Fos and EGR1 positive neurons following CTA ( Fig. 1d-f; c-Fos, control: 128.13 ± 9.46 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6, CTA: 82.21 ± 11.73 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6 rats, p < 0.01; EGR1, control: 175.90 ± 15.65 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6, CTA: 133.03 ± 10.10 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6, p < 0.05), suggesting that taste/malaise association decreased GC neurons activity, consistent with previous reports testing neuronal activity 2,12 and showing changes in markers for plasticity 10,13 .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…There was a significant decrease in the number of c-Fos and EGR1 positive neurons following CTA ( Fig. 1d-f; c-Fos, control: 128.13 ± 9.46 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6, CTA: 82.21 ± 11.73 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6 rats, p < 0.01; EGR1, control: 175.90 ± 15.65 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6, CTA: 133.03 ± 10.10 positive nuclei/0.1mm 2 , N = 6, p < 0.05), suggesting that taste/malaise association decreased GC neurons activity, consistent with previous reports testing neuronal activity 2,12 and showing changes in markers for plasticity 10,13 .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, these studies do not identify why LC neurons are activated in the LTF group, but not in the “No LTF” group; this would be the subject of future studies. But, as presented and interpreted, our data are consistent with previously studies showing that increases in c-Fos expression can be used to identify cells associated with inducing other forms of plasticity, such as granule cells and their role in mediating long-term potentiation (LTP) in the cerebellum 35 , or parvalbumin basket cells and their role in regulating plasticity 36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The decrease in the number of IEG-labeled neurons following CTA suggests that the associative learning between taste and malaise induced plastic changes in this region of GC, but does not indicate which form of plasticity these changes represent ( Inberg et al, 2013 ; Gandolfi et al, 2017 ). Indeed, the effect could result from changes to the intrinsic properties of GC neurons, affecting their overall excitability and input/output function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Current thinking associates learning with an increase in synaptic efficacy ( Bliss and Collingridge, 1993 ; Rogan et al, 1997 ; Dityatev and Bolshakov, 2005 ), and changes in molecular markers for plasticity following CTA have been interpreted as indication of LTP expression ( Shema et al, 2007 ; Gal-Ben-Ari and Rosenblum, 2011 ). However, many of the molecular mechanisms involved in CTA ( Berman and Dudai, 2001 ; Gal-Ben-Ari and Rosenblum, 2011 ; Guzman-Ramos and Bermudez-Rattoni, 2012 ) can be engaged by both LTP and LTD ( Yilmaz-Rastoder et al, 2011 ; Gandolfi et al, 2017 ; Li and Pozzo-Miller, 2019 ). Additional evidence in support of the interpretation that CTA should potentiate BLA input to GC came from studies based on BLA activation with drug infusions or tetanic electrical stimulation during CTA learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%