Cell-to-cell communication was characterized in prefusion chick embryo myoblast cultures, and it was determined that the prefusion myoblasts can interact via gap junctions, ionic coupling, and metabolic coupling. The biological relevance of this communication was supported by the detection of gap junctions between myoblasts in embryonic muscle. Communication was also examined in fusionarrested cultures to determine its potential relationship to fusion competency. In cultures that were fusion arrested by treatment with either 1.8 mM ethyleneglycolbis-(fl-aminoethyl ether)N,N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), 3.3 x 10 -6 M 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR), or 1 /~g/ml cycloheximide (CHX), both gap junctions and ionic coupling were present. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that cell communication is not a sufficient property by itself, to generate fusion between myoblasts. The potential role of communication in myogenesis is discussed with respect to these observations. KEY WORDS cell-to-cell communication junctions 9 ionic coupling metabolic coupling myoblast fusion myogenesis gapThe differentiation of skeletal muscle in vivo and in vitro (in culture) is accompanied by the fusion of mononucleated muscle cells (myoblasts) into multinucleated mature muscle fibers (58). This fusion event, in culture, is preceded by a period of cell multiplication and cellular interaction. During this time, the cells are closely apposed and aligned in multicellular strings; this stage of differentiation has been referred to as the "prefusion lag period" (61). Under standard culture conditions this lag period is quite constant, and only cells which have completed their prefusion changes participate in the formation of muitinucleated fibers (59). The fusion process that follows the lag period has been previously regarded as a critical event in myogenesis. However, at present, it appears that it is just one of the important events that contribute to the formation of a differentiated muscle fiber (1, 12. 16, 19, 26, 31, 34, 36, 41, 54, 55, 56, 57, 62). The actual fusion process requires a direct physical interaction of the plasma membranes from adjacent cells, and this had led to a series of investigations of the cell surface elements that may be involved in regulating fusion (5,14,20). Other studies have suggested that fusion is not necessarily regulated by cell surface components; it may, in fact, be under the direct control of intracellular elements (62). Recently, it has been reported that a specific type of cell contact, the gap junction (30), and low-resistance pathways (6) are present between muscle cells during amphibian myotome development in vivo. In both studies, it was suggested that gap junctional communication between the muscle cells is related to the efficient transfer of excitatory stimuli from somite to somite, and not to cell fusion. Data from studies on embryonic rat and chick skeletal muscle cells in culture indicate the possible existence of ionic coupling (measured indirectly) and gap junctionlike structures betwee...