1985
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03880.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of cellular promoters during herpes virus infection of biochemically transformed cells.

Abstract: At least two of the immediate‐early (IE) products of herpes simplex virus‐1 (HSV‐1) are responsible for the activation of transcription from viral early promoters. This process appears not to be promoter specific since several unrelated viral and cellular plasmid‐borne promoters can also be activated in short‐term transfection assays. This paper describes experiments that show that cellular promoters integrated into the host genome can also be activated during viral infection, and that this process is brought … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
51
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other published examples of cellular gene activation by HSV were observed after infection with wt virus (LaThangue et al, 1984;Everett, 1985;Kennedy et al, 1985;Patel et aL, 1986), suggesting that they represent a different phenomenon from that reported here. The induction of the stress response by viruses other than HSV also appears to involve a different mechanism, since wt viruses mediate the effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Other published examples of cellular gene activation by HSV were observed after infection with wt virus (LaThangue et al, 1984;Everett, 1985;Kennedy et al, 1985;Patel et aL, 1986), suggesting that they represent a different phenomenon from that reported here. The induction of the stress response by viruses other than HSV also appears to involve a different mechanism, since wt viruses mediate the effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…First, as discussed above, preclusion of ND10 disruption by overexpression of PML has no effect on viral replication in cultured cells (97). Second, this hypothesis is inconsistent with the observation that the transactivation function of ICP0 is restricted to genes introduced into the cells by transfection or infection and a specific subset of cellular genes rather than affecting a diversity of viral and cellular genes contained in the infected cell (30,72).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite 3 decades of research and enormous interest, it is not known how the functions encoded in ICP0 account for its phenotype in either infected or transduced cells. However, available evidence suggests that ICP0 is a multifunctional protein and that its role in viral infection reflects the sum of its multiple and diverse functions (132).Studies published nearly 20 years ago established that ICP0 activates genes introduced into cells by transfection or infection (29,30,54, 118,129). Furthermore, ICP0 also activates a specific subset of cellular genes, including several p53-responsive genes that it activates independently of p53 (72).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ICP0 is a nuclear phosphoprotein that behaves as a promiscuous activator of viral and cellular genes (7,11,28,29). ICP0 also functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to target several host proteins for proteasomal degradation (4,10,11,16,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%