2013
DOI: 10.6018/reifop.16.1.179441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actitudes de los estudiantes del Grado de Magisterio y del Máster de Educación Especial hacia la inclusión educativa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
4
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the conclusions were not so appropriate regarding the selective consideration of the student type who should attend ordinary classes, due to their excessive and negative worrying about their own training and acting capabilities relating certain students with SEN, mainly, just like due to the implications not always well appreciated about their school inclusion. These results coincide with those reached by other authors, such as Tárrraga, Grau & Peirats (2013), who recorded negative attitudes in the students referring to specific training, together with Hernández and García (2017), Mangano (2015) and Mendoza (2015), who reflected in their research the profusion of fears and worries towards inclusion, due to their lack of skills to develop inclusive practices and to address the SEN (Llorent & Álamo, 2016), which makes them fell excessively dependant on other professionals' support. It is advisable to add that these findings have also been obtained through traditional research in the late 20th and early 21st century, following the revisions carried out by Tárraga et al (2013), which also apply to the body of working teachers (Clavijo et al, 2016;Ewing, Monsen & Kielblock, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the conclusions were not so appropriate regarding the selective consideration of the student type who should attend ordinary classes, due to their excessive and negative worrying about their own training and acting capabilities relating certain students with SEN, mainly, just like due to the implications not always well appreciated about their school inclusion. These results coincide with those reached by other authors, such as Tárrraga, Grau & Peirats (2013), who recorded negative attitudes in the students referring to specific training, together with Hernández and García (2017), Mangano (2015) and Mendoza (2015), who reflected in their research the profusion of fears and worries towards inclusion, due to their lack of skills to develop inclusive practices and to address the SEN (Llorent & Álamo, 2016), which makes them fell excessively dependant on other professionals' support. It is advisable to add that these findings have also been obtained through traditional research in the late 20th and early 21st century, following the revisions carried out by Tárraga et al (2013), which also apply to the body of working teachers (Clavijo et al, 2016;Ewing, Monsen & Kielblock, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Concerning the educational stage, seven studies detected less favorable attitudes toward inclusion in secondary education than in primary education teachers [25,29,30,[33][34][35]41]. At the same time, early childhood teachers' attitudes seem to be more positive than primary education teachers' attitudes [25,33,35,42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se estudiaron las opiniones relativas a la inclusión (ORI) utilizando la adaptación al castellano de la escala Opinions relative to Integration of students with disabilities (Antonak y Larrivee, 1995), realizada por Tárraga, Grau y Peirats (2013). La escala ORI, en su versión en castellano (Tárraga et al, 2013), cuenta con un total de 23 ítems distribuidos en 5 factores: Beneficios de la inclusión; Atención generalista vs. atención especialista; Metodología y manejo de la conducta en el aula; Esfuerzo y dedicación del profesorado hacia los estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales (NEE); y Formación y competencia del profesorado.…”
Section: Datos Cuantitativosunclassified