2018
DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action research in the healthcare field: a scoping review

Abstract: There are several ways of conducting action research in healthcare that consider the researcher's aims and theoretical assumptions. Further qualitative systematic review questions may arise from the results and conclusions of this scoping review.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study drew on Action Research 21 as a methodology, with iterative implementation, evaluation and pathway modification stages. Local commissioners and prison healthcare stakeholders provided direct input into the pathway assessment and redesign process 22 . Here, we report on the first two phases of the pathway.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study drew on Action Research 21 as a methodology, with iterative implementation, evaluation and pathway modification stages. Local commissioners and prison healthcare stakeholders provided direct input into the pathway assessment and redesign process 22 . Here, we report on the first two phases of the pathway.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a participatory action research approach designed for healthcare contexts [26], we engaged stakeholders using a combination of electronic questionnaires and in-person interviews to inventory current PRO implementations across UW Medicine, characterize common use cases for PROs, and develop recommendations for a system-wide implementation strategy. Action research is advantageous for studying healthcare settings where clinical stakeholders have deep contextual knowledge about their environments and where researchers benefit from actively participating in the topic being studied [27][28][29]. Through cycles of planning (identifying issues, research questions, and inquiry methods), acting (gathering data), observing (health system project activities and meetings), and reflecting (analyzing data and communicating) [30], the research team informed UW Medicine clinical practice transformation and PRO stakeholder communities as they strategized about future system-wide PRO implementations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worldwide focus of healthcare research on the development of sustainable changes (Cordeiro & Soares, 2018;Meyer, 2000;Montgomery et al, 2015) aligns with the intentions of action research. Action research designs are intended to initiate and support empowerment, promote the skills to act, increase knowledge, change participants' attitudes and ultimately change practice (Bradbury, 2015;Greenwood & Levin, 2007;Svensson & Nielsen, 2006).…”
Section: Me Thodology and Me Thodmentioning
confidence: 97%