2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action-related semantic content and negation polarity modulate motor areas during sentence reading: An event-related desynchronization study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generation of an unspecific verb associated to a series of acoustically presented single nouns was shown to be accompanied by power suppression in the 15–25 Hz beta range on the left premotor cortex [38]. In addition to this, when reading hand-action versus abstract sentences, a decrease of mu rhythm was observed on left and central frontal leads [39]. Listening to verbal stimuli (pseudowords) that had been previously associated with movements resulted in suppression of the mu rhythm over the centro-parietal region [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Generation of an unspecific verb associated to a series of acoustically presented single nouns was shown to be accompanied by power suppression in the 15–25 Hz beta range on the left premotor cortex [38]. In addition to this, when reading hand-action versus abstract sentences, a decrease of mu rhythm was observed on left and central frontal leads [39]. Listening to verbal stimuli (pseudowords) that had been previously associated with movements resulted in suppression of the mu rhythm over the centro-parietal region [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, transient differences between hand and abstract verbs emerged in event-related fields with a latency of about 600 ms. These results may reflect the same processes as described before for alpha and beta in action-related versus abstract language processing in the absence of overt manual movement (van Elk et al, 2010;Alemanno et al, 2012;Moreno et al, 2013;Niccolai et al, 2014) where stronger power suppression is thought to indicate motor system activation by verb processing itself. Alternatively, since this is not directly transferable to situations with concurrent motor tasks as in the interference paradigm, differences may arise mainly from the difference in task demands in the Go vs. NoGo conditions where manual responses were given only in the hand verb conditions.…”
Section: Meg Power Modulations and Semantic Interferencementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Taken together, the role of beta oscillations in embodied language processing makes it a feasible candidate for a functional mechanism of language-motor interference. Similarly, alpha band (8-13 Hz) oscillations have been associated with action execution (Salmelin et al, 1995;Sebastiani et al, 2014), observation (Caetano et al, 2007;Avanzini et al, 2012), motor imagery (Pfurtscheller et al, 2006;de Lange et al, 2008), spoken language processing (Strauß et al, 2014), and action language processing (Alemanno et al, 2012;Fargier et al, 2012). Since alpha band oscillations may be more related to sensory than motor processing (Salmelin et al, 1995;Brinkman et al, 2014;Sebastiani et al, 2014;Coll et al, 2015), the focus in the current study is on the beta band, but alpha oscillations are also investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Surprisingly, there are to date only very few studies which implement this technique to study motorrelated semantics (Alemanno et al, 2012;Van Elk et al, 2010), all of which were done with native speakers and investigated sentencelevel processing. Thus, the issue of sensorimotor involvement in L2 semantic representations and language comprehension remains virtually unexplored in the ERD domain as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%