2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108059
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grasping Hand Verbs: Oscillatory Beta and Alpha Correlates of Action-Word Processing

Abstract: The grounded cognition framework proposes that sensorimotor brain areas, which are typically involved in perception and action, also play a role in linguistic processing. We assessed oscillatory modulation during visual presentation of single verbs and localized cortical motor regions by means of isometric contraction of hand and foot muscles. Analogously to oscillatory activation patterns accompanying voluntary movements, we expected a somatotopically distributed suppression of beta and alpha frequencies in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(93 reference statements)
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, transient differences between hand and abstract verbs emerged in event-related fields with a latency of about 600 ms. These results may reflect the same processes as described before for alpha and beta in action-related versus abstract language processing in the absence of overt manual movement (van Elk et al, 2010;Alemanno et al, 2012;Moreno et al, 2013;Niccolai et al, 2014) where stronger power suppression is thought to indicate motor system activation by verb processing itself. Alternatively, since this is not directly transferable to situations with concurrent motor tasks as in the interference paradigm, differences may arise mainly from the difference in task demands in the Go vs. NoGo conditions where manual responses were given only in the hand verb conditions.…”
Section: Meg Power Modulations and Semantic Interferencesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, transient differences between hand and abstract verbs emerged in event-related fields with a latency of about 600 ms. These results may reflect the same processes as described before for alpha and beta in action-related versus abstract language processing in the absence of overt manual movement (van Elk et al, 2010;Alemanno et al, 2012;Moreno et al, 2013;Niccolai et al, 2014) where stronger power suppression is thought to indicate motor system activation by verb processing itself. Alternatively, since this is not directly transferable to situations with concurrent motor tasks as in the interference paradigm, differences may arise mainly from the difference in task demands in the Go vs. NoGo conditions where manual responses were given only in the hand verb conditions.…”
Section: Meg Power Modulations and Semantic Interferencesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Still, it is conceivable that early processing of hand and foot action verbs in the current study did activate the motor system-presumably somatotopically-just as it does in the absence of movement tasks (Hauk et al, 2004;Tettamanti et al, 2005;Kemmerer et al, 2008;Niccolai et al, 2014), but that this is obliterated by the presence of motor preparatory processes.…”
Section: Meg Power Modulations and Semantic Interferencementioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent EEG/MEG studies of motor-language interaction in the brain employed beta ERD to characterize brain activation elicited by action verbs (Klepp, Niccolai, Buccino, Schnitzler, & Biermann-Ruben, 2015;Niccolai et al, 2014;Schaller, Weiss, & Müller, 2017;van Elk, van Schie, Zwaan, & Bekkering, 2010). Comparison of their results highlights the advantage of MEG over EEG in capturing verb-related beta oscillations (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and their modulations that were previously reported for synchronous MEG and EEG recordings (Nikulin, Nikulina, Yamashita, Rossi, & Kähkönen, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%