2018
DOI: 10.3233/jae-182304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action of torsion and axial moment in a new nonlinear cantilever-type vibration energy harvester

Abstract: The effects of composite motion involving action of torsion and axial moment on the vibrating element on characteristics of a new cantilever-type nonlinear electromagnetic vibration energy harvester are analyzed. The systems with softening and hardening action of the magnetic force are analyzed. The impact of the phenomenon on electromagnetic quantities of the system is investigated using the 2d analytical and 3d numerical models. The simulated and measured frequency-response characteristics show noticeable di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 5, the output power increased as much as by 300%. The slight (14 percent) differences between the results in Table 3 and the maximum power measured for the optimized system are most likely due to complex (non-straight line) motional effects of magnets 3 on the induced emf in the physical harvester, which is a specific feature of the considered system that we identified and analyzed in [20], and is also due to inaccuracy of manufacturing of physical coils where the turn distribution does not match exactly one presented in Figure 4b. Though, the values of total coil resistance and inductance R c and L c measured using the laboratory multimeter agree to those calculated from formulas (3)-(9) within 2 and 6 percent, respectively (see Table 4).…”
Section: Strategy IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 5, the output power increased as much as by 300%. The slight (14 percent) differences between the results in Table 3 and the maximum power measured for the optimized system are most likely due to complex (non-straight line) motional effects of magnets 3 on the induced emf in the physical harvester, which is a specific feature of the considered system that we identified and analyzed in [20], and is also due to inaccuracy of manufacturing of physical coils where the turn distribution does not match exactly one presented in Figure 4b. Though, the values of total coil resistance and inductance R c and L c measured using the laboratory multimeter agree to those calculated from formulas (3)-(9) within 2 and 6 percent, respectively (see Table 4).…”
Section: Strategy IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnets 2 are stationary with respect to the armature and are used to develop an auxiliary magnetic force that brings nonlinear mechanical resonance into the system. The converter belongs to a class of nonlinear electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters whose insightful analysis including kinematic and dynamic effects can be found in [11] and [20,25]. Figure 1b shows variations of potential energy vs. relative displacement of permanent magnets (No.…”
Section: System and Its Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation