1995
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910330405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action of Compression and Cations on the Proton and Deuterium Relaxation in Cartilage

Abstract: In this paper, investigations are described on the influence of osmotic pressures and of varying cation concentrations on water relaxation times in cartilage (pig articular cartilage and bovine nasal cartilage). Both water content and relaxation times decrease strongly with increasing osmotic pressure. This relaxation behavior can be explained in terms of a fast chemical exchange between unbound and bound water. Na+ does not influence water content or relaxation times, whereas Ca2+ causes a small reduction in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the proton relaxation time constants reported here are consistent with those of previous work in which cartilage compression was performed via an osmotic technique prior to MR evaluation at atmospheric pressure (21). The consistency of the present results with those cited indicates that changes in compression-induced proton MR characteristics can be generated by both mechanical or osmotic pressure gradients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the proton relaxation time constants reported here are consistent with those of previous work in which cartilage compression was performed via an osmotic technique prior to MR evaluation at atmospheric pressure (21). The consistency of the present results with those cited indicates that changes in compression-induced proton MR characteristics can be generated by both mechanical or osmotic pressure gradients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, it is possible for the sGAG concentration of the w 1 -and w 2 -associated compartments to increase without an equivalent increase in the fractional weights. Similar considerations apply to the fact that T 23 displayed a higher correlation coefficient with sGAG content than did either T 22 or T 21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Even-numbered echoes were used for analysis, 9 yielding an effective TE of 1.2 ms, precluding detection of rapidly relaxing collagen-bound water. 20,21 Intensities were fit to a three-parameter monoexponential function to obtain conventional T 2 relaxation times; the same data were used for multiexponential analysis as described in the section ''Fitting of multiexponential T 2 relaxation data. ''…”
Section: Mr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, changes in water proton relaxation times were readily attributed to changes in tissue hydration, with little discussion as to the role of different tissue compartments on the respective MRI relaxation times (20,21). Furthermore, the diffusion coefficient of water in cartilage over time periods on the order of 10 msec was found to be more sensitive to overall hydration than to matrix composition (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%