1997
DOI: 10.1108/00400919710175196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action learning comes of age ‐ part 4: where and when?

Abstract: The last in a series of four articles that seeks to answer questions about the domains of applicability of action learning. Aims to reach some conclusions about where and when action learning is most appropriate. The authors reflect on their own experience as action learning participants and set advisers to identify the conditions which best support action learning. Offers suggestions for those people who may be considering setting up action learning sets within their own organization. Concludes that action le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is where I occasionally encounter some resistance. (Lawson et al (1997) report similar experiences in courses adopting an action learning approach, although resistance might be expected whenever we deviate from a conventional student-teacher model.) The stance or role I should adopt in the course is often debated among participants, providing an additional opportunity to critique a conventional model.…”
Section: The Pedagogical Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is where I occasionally encounter some resistance. (Lawson et al (1997) report similar experiences in courses adopting an action learning approach, although resistance might be expected whenever we deviate from a conventional student-teacher model.) The stance or role I should adopt in the course is often debated among participants, providing an additional opportunity to critique a conventional model.…”
Section: The Pedagogical Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These relationships are brought into sharp focus when work is submitted for assessment (see also Lawson et al (1997); Leach et al (2001)). One means for promoting collaboration, while calling into question a conventional student-teacher model, is peer assessment of the first piece of assessable work, where each participant receives written feedback and a grade from another participant and from me.…”
Section: The Pedagogical Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…114‐15), to the extent that by the end of the 1980 s action learning was in the top ten of 90 different identified methods and approaches for management learning (AMED, 1991). Yet, despite such long‐standing interest, in the past, many universities have not adopted action learning (Lawson et al , 1997). During the last ten years there has, however, been a growing interest in academia in action learning (Frank, 1996; Mumford, 1994; Smith and O'Neil, 2003a), and a number of universities have sought to incorporate action learning with programs.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With its focus action-oriented learning, ESD can play an important part in collective action toward identifying practices that, to some degree, can increase climate change awareness and mitigation at the educational level, as action-oriented learning “flourishes when the culture demands action alongside learning” (Lawson et al , 1997, p. 226). More recently, Leonard (2015) argues that the purpose of action-oriented learning should be to achieve effective and creative solutions to complex, critical and urgent problems.…”
Section: Rethinking Education: Integrating Action-oriented Learning and Esdmentioning
confidence: 99%