Acta Diabetologica is 50 and well: long live Acta!

Porta, Massimo

doi:10.1007/s00592-014-0554-6

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 37 ] They all have been cited more than 50 times. Because the history of research tells us that milestone papers can be rejected when they first submitted; [ 20 , 38 ] thus, to reveal some gold papers, the editors, reviewers should keep guard on quality and be more open to the arriving manuscripts. [ 20 , 38 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research

Zhang

Huang

2017

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research

Zhang

Huang

2017

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Two years ago we celebrated Acta Diabetologica's fiftieth anniversary [1] and then proceeded to bring in a number of changes to help it meet the challenges that await diabetes research, and the reporting of diabetes research, in the next 50 years. The Advisory Board was enlarged to members from all over the world, and we take this opportunity to thank them for accepting an additional burden to their already busy schedules.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do we need research on reporting on diabetes research?

2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“First, know thyself”: cognition and error in medicine

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although error is an integral part of the world of medicine, physicians have always been little inclined to take into account their own mistakes and the extraordinary technological progress observed in the last decades does not seem to have resulted in a significant reduction in the percentage of diagnostic errors. The failure in the reduction in diagnostic errors, notwithstanding the considerable investment in human and economic resources, has paved the way to new strategies which were made available by the development of cognitive psychology, the branch of psychology that aims at understanding the mechanisms of human reasoning. This new approach led us to realize that we are not fully rational agents able to take decisions on the basis of logical and probabilistically appropriate evaluations. In us, two different and mostly independent modes of reasoning coexist: a fast or non-analytical reasoning, which tends to be largely automatic and fast-reactive, and a slow or analytical reasoning, which permits to give rationally founded answers. One of the features of the fast mode of reasoning is the employment of standardized rules, termed ''heuristics.'' Heuristics lead physicians to correct choices in a large percentage of cases. Unfortunately, cases exist wherein the heuristic triggered fails to fit the target problem, so that the fast mode of reasoning can lead us to unreflectively perform actions exposing us and others to variable degrees of risk. Cognitive errors arise as a result of these cases. Our review illustrates how cognitive errors can cause diagnostic problems in clinical practice.

show abstract

Acta Diabetologica is 50 and well: long live Acta!

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research

The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research

Do we need research on reporting on diabetes research?

“First, know thyself”: cognition and error in medicine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About