Acromiohumeral cerclage in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for recurrent instability

Salazar, Dane; Bialek, Samantha E.; Garbis, Nickolas

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.136

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the present meta-analysis could not determine whether one surgical method was superior to the other in terms of postoperative complications. For example, one study showed that RSA has a risk of postoperative shoulder dislocation higher than that in HA (45). Considering that such fractures vary in the degree of severity due to the age of the patients and degree of osteoporosis among individual cases, the selection of specific surgical methods should still follow the principle of individualized treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta‑analysis update

Han

Wang

et al. 2022

Exp Ther Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. The Embase, Pubmed Central, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical databases were searched between January 2009 and January 2022 to identify relevant studies. According to the search strategy, a total of 210 associated studies were retrieved and 16 were finally included. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for the data analysis. This study indicated that patients in the RSA group had significantly improved treatment outcomes compared with patients in the HA group, as assessed by Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (95% CI, 1.69-3.76; P<0.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (95% CI, 11.81-24.88; P<0.001) and shoulder range of motion (ROM; 95% CI, 3.41-9.07; P<0.001). However, the HA group was superior to the RSA group in terms of the Oxford Shoulder score (95% CI, 2.89-11.11; P<0.001). There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and complications. Overall, for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in the elderly, the RSA group had improved postoperative ROM and functional scores compared with the HA group, without significant difference in the incidence of complications. However, HA remains a safe and reliable treatment option.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%